Teams

KY/LOU/BEAN

2022 USTA COMBO 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-10vs KY/LOU/MOORE/JORDANWon 10
W#1 DoublesMiriam Long / Stephanie Young vs Brenda Stofer / Kristina Jordan6-1, 6-1
2022-08-21vs KY/LOU/HENDRICH/CORBINWon 10
W#2 DoublesSue Condict / Stephanie Young vs Mary Jones / Sandra Nakayama6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-13vs KY/LOU/POLING/HEFLEYWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Young / Janet Day vs Sandra Meyerowitz / Jane Schmidt6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sue Condict
published
3.71
Sherry Lafferty
published
3.69
Miriam Long
published
3.48
Jane St Clair
published
3.43
Sarah McDade
published
Beth McCulley
published 3.5
3.16
Sandra Sorrels
published
3.15
Penny DeVenuto
published
3.15
Janie Bean
published
3.08
Debbie McCoy
published 3.5
3.00
Janice Lechleiter
published
2.98
Stephanie Young
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Debbie French
published 3.5
Janet Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah McDade + Jane St Clair3354% games+1.4% vs expected
Sarah McDade + Janie Bean3254% games−5.5% vs expected
Jane St Clair + Janie Bean91048% games−6.8% vs expected
Jane St Clair + Miriam Long4157% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Young + Sue Condict213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Young + Janie Bean123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Young + Beth McCulley303 matchesnot enough data
Janie Bean + Miriam Long033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Condict
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Sherry Lafferty
29W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Miriam Long
26W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jane St Clair
55W–58L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Sarah McDade
36W–32L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Beth McCulley
23W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Sorrels
36W–40L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Penny DeVenuto
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Janie Bean
35W–42L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Debbie McCoy
15W–37L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Janice Lechleiter
9W–29L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Stephanie Young
123W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Debbie French
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.91
Janet Day
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.