Teams

ABadulis 40+ 5.0

2022 Cap Spring NCTA 40 & Over 5.0 · 5.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-18vs PreissLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllan Badulis / Carlos Garcia-Shelton vs Peter Vangraafeiland / Victor Meir4-6, 1-6
2022-05-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlos Garcia-Shelton / Zachary Nelson vs Michael Edwards / Jason Kinder4-6, 2-6
2022-05-04vs PreissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Carlos Garcia vs Martin Green / Jon Davis2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarlos Garcia-Shelton / Clay Garst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-27vs PreissSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Carlos Garcia vs Martin Green / James Poole6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDrew Sandri / Carlos Garcia-Shelton vs William Webb / Michael Edwards6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-20vs PreissLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlos Garcia-Shelton / Clay Garst vs Jason Kinder / Andrew Moretz2-6, 0-6
2022-04-06vs PreissLost 02
L#1 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Tim Rufiange vs Jon Davis / Andrew Moretz3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Carlos Garcia vs Christopher Edwards / Justin Roberson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-30vs PreissWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Garcia / Joshua Franceschina vs Christopher Edwards / Justin Roberson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Joshua Franceschina
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
Brent Bennett
published 5
4.71
Drew Sandri
published 5
4.40
Allan Badulis
published 4.5
4.32
Praveen Chandrasekhar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Tim Rufiange
published
4.20
Clay Garst
published 4.5
4.15
Carlos Garcia-Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Shaun Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Garcia-Shelton + Praveen Chandrasekhar2644% games−9.0% vs expected
Joshua Franceschina + Praveen Chandrasekhar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Joshua Franceschina
80W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Brent Bennett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Drew Sandri
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.71
4.5
Allan Badulis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Praveen Chandrasekhar
139W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Tim Rufiange
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Clay Garst
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Carlos Garcia-Shelton
117W–127L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Shaun Ward
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.