Teams

Cherokee/Teresa Curry

Cherokee Spring - Southern COMBO 40 & Over · 7.5 Business Women (Monday night)

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-14vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusie Ivy / Billi Jo Wright vs Megan Fairchild / Julie Newkirk6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Nielsen / Tracy Kennedy vs Shannon Stokley / Tracy Whitmore1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Vorhies / Donna Cobb vs Noreen Courchene / Stacey Levantis3-6, 3-6
2024-05-06vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusie Ivy / Martina Negron vs Tracy Whitmore / Kerri Schmitt3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Keel / Chinny Law vs Noreen Courchene / Tracy Schoppy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Simons / Barbara Hart vs Julie Newkirk / Shannon Stokley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-29vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartina Negron / Tiffany Simpson vs Megan Fairchild / Tracy Whitmore6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Ivy / Tracy Kennedy vs Leslie Wagner / Tracy Schoppy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTeresa Keel / Sheryl Klink vs Stacey Levantis / Nancy Vining6-2, 6-3
2024-04-25vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittLost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffany Simpson / Sarah Warshaw vs Noreen Courchene / Stacey Levantis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Vorhies / Billi Jo Wright vs Tracy Whitmore / Megan Fairchild6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Nielsen / Donna Cobb vs Tracy Schoppy / Leslie Wagner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittWon 21
L#1 DoublesChinny Law / Martina Negron vs Megan Fairchild / Tracy Whitmore1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Kennedy / Julie Simons vs Kerri Schmitt / Julie Newkirk7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheryl Klink / Billi Jo Wright vs Nancy Vining / Tracy Schoppy6-3, 6-4
2024-04-08vs Laurel Brooke - SchmittWon 30
W#1 DoublesTiffany Simpson / Sarah Warshaw vs Petra Wiggins / Tracy Whitmore7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Vorhies / Tracy Kennedy vs Leslie Wagner / Tracy Schoppy6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusie Ivy / Billi Jo Wright vs Shannon Stokley / Stacey Levantis7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Business Women (Monday night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jennifer Vorhies
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Susie Ivy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Tiffany Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Sheryl Klink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Chinny Law
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Adrienne Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Martina Negron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Teresa Keel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Tracy Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Billi Jo Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Sarah Warshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Barbara Hart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donna Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Simons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Klink + Adrienne Nielsen5156% games+5.2% vs expected
Tracy Kennedy + Sarah Warshaw10257% games+4.5% vs expected
Sheryl Klink + Billi Jo Wright6060% games+2.2% vs expected
Sarah Warshaw + Billi Jo Wright2545% games−3.8% vs expected
Tiffany Simpson + Martina Negron5359% gamesnot enough data
Susie Ivy + Billi Jo Wright3255% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Kennedy + Billi Jo Wright314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Keel + Martina Negron404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Vorhies
81W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Susie Ivy
29W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
Tiffany Simpson
45W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.85
Sheryl Klink
27W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Chinny Law
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Adrienne Nielsen
65W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Martina Negron
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Teresa Keel
34W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Tracy Kennedy
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Billi Jo Wright
35W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Sarah Warshaw
34W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Hart
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Donna Cobb
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Simons
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.