Teams

Richards/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 7.5 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Caitlin Bond
published 4
3.58
Nelli Golmeeva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Gloria Hicks
published
3.40
Latasha Echols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Grace Bann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sophia Garrison
published
3.18
Susana Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Omitope Taylor
published
3.12
Constance Dyson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Sandra Richards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Agatha Asemota
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Cheryl Body
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Veronica Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Bann + Gloria Hicks2351% games+12.2% vs expected
Susana Cunningham + Veronica Anthony4356% games+6.6% vs expected
Latasha Echols + Gloria Hicks4447% games+5.9% vs expected
Cheryl Body + Grace Bann2442% games−12.2% vs expected
Constance Dyson + Veronica Anthony134 matchesnot enough data
Constance Dyson + Cheryl Body033 matchesnot enough data
Constance Dyson + Agatha Asemota123 matchesnot enough data
Grace Bann + Veronica Anthony123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caitlin Bond
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Nelli Golmeeva
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Gloria Hicks
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Latasha Echols
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Grace Bann
31W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Sophia Garrison
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Susana Cunningham
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Omitope Taylor
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Constance Dyson
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Sandra Richards
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Agatha Asemota
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Cheryl Body
7W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Veronica Anthony
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Sheila Wright-jackson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.