Teams

Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

19 players · average NTRP 4.04 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-08vs Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/AllenWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesRosa McGuire / Rachel Labrum vs Jana Fairbanks / Lisa Bullington6-3, 5-1
2022-12-01vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRosa McGuire / Carly Reese vs Sue Smith / Kortney Osborne6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-17vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#2 Female DoublesMandy Berg / Rina Benson vs AMy Huish / Kristin Killian6-4, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesRosa McGuire / Nicole Mills vs Renae Brooks / Jutien Page6-3, 5-4
2022-11-10vs Liberty Park Tennis-Young/SwensenSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAngie Neuberger / Carly Reese vs Christine Fotheringham / Alisa Gardner3-6, 4-5
W#3 Female DoublesRachel Labrum / Heather Probst vs Chandi Hurd / Dalynn Thomas6-0, 6-3
2022-11-03Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRina Benson / Lisa Caldwell vs Regina Johnson / Karin Smith5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman5014615127
2Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry5116818156
3RISE AC-Glines/Glines4215922190
4Ivory Ridge-Monson/Black42131124177
5Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek32101021149
6Cottonwood Club-Warren/Briesacher33141024163
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33141025196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24131127193
9Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/Allen2491532242
10Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen2481634233
11Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1561837226
12Sunpro-Daniels/Wilson1551939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Jessica Schulz
published
4.01
Deyce Peterson
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Singles 20% · published 4
3.89
Heather Probst
usually #3 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 4
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Carly Reese
usually #2 Female Doubles 43%, also #1 Female Doubles 43% · published 4
3.87
Rina Benson
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Rachel Labrum
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
Ann Hronek
published 4
Heidi Clark
published 4
3.72
Kalee King
published 4
3.72
Amber Greenwood
published 4
3.70
Kimberly Mayfield
published
3.68
Melissa Despain
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Angie Neuberger
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Nicole Mills
published
Lisa Caldwell
published
Melinda Romney
published
Rachel Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Benson + Rosa McGuire6083% games+16.7% vs expected
Carly Reese + Heather Probst8167% games+11.1% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Carly Reese10561% games+10.4% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Deyce Peterson5166% games+10.0% vs expected
Rina Benson + Amber Greenwood11367% games+9.9% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire22763% games+8.2% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Heather Probst8263% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Jessica Schulz
126W–50L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Deyce Peterson
169W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.01
4
Heather Probst
114W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Carly Reese
178W–87L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Ann Hronek
65W–44L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Heidi Clark
47W–31L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Amber Greenwood
154W–66L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Kimberly Mayfield
65W–37L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Melissa Despain
174W–109L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Angie Neuberger
73W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Lisa Caldwell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Romney
41W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Ray
60W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.