Teams

BTA-Longhorns-Endo

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.95 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs RTC-SimmondsWon 31
W#1 DoublesYunda Huang / Jiandan Zheng vs Bridget Greenberg / Kathy Tsutsumoto2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesXiaohe Hao vs Louise Bowman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuper Sandy / Krystle Peeters vs Haley Neff-LaFord / Shweta Bhat6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAsako Endo / Hui Xu vs Carrie Toppano / Susan van Meter6-2, 6-1
2026-03-08vs RBW-BozickLost 13
L#1 DoublesYunda Huang / Xiaobei Li vs Nellie Bozick / Maren Gibson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRama Karve vs Marisa Webb3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPorsha Kahlon / Krystle Peeters vs Takako Chavez / Katherine DeStephano1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAsako Endo / Super Sandy vs Roseshel Howe / Lia Morrison6-4, 6-1
2026-03-01vs NWW-BETC-IkedaLost 04
L#1 DoublesXiaohe Hao / Jiandan Zheng vs Rebecca Mann / Ruthann Nelson6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAle Jimenez vs Lynne Nowicki6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAsako Endo / Rama Karve vs Diane Javelli / Happy Grove2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKrystle Peeters / Porsha Kahlon vs Kathy Wang / Cathy Hollar4-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs AYTC-TrumbauerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesXiaobei Li / Yunda Huang vs Kathy Trumbauer / Martha Tucker6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAle Jimenez vs Emily Swanson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesXiaohe Hao / Rama Karve vs Claudia Martinucci / Elizabeth Parker0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHui Xu / Krystle Peeters vs Ann Bowden / Jennifer Grimes5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-01-31vs MI-NowakowskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesXiaohe Hao / Xiaobei Li vs Krista Nowakowski / Nandita Parikh3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHui Xu / Porsha Kahlon vs Julie Sedlacek / Garima Tandon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJiandan Zheng / Yunda Huang vs Stacey Roehrs / Kathryn Bauman3-6, 0-6
2026-01-24vs WSC-Golden Roast and RallyLost 04
L#1 DoublesHui Xu / Super Sandy vs Meghan Bradner / Julia Roast3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesXiaohe Hao vs Elise Zabel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAsako Endo / Porsha Kahlon vs Judit Velcsov / Nikki Juhlin0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYunda Huang / Xiaobei Li vs Stephanie Artati / Stuart Childress2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-01-18vs TCSP-Serving Fine Lines-SpainWon 31
L#1 DoublesXiaobei Li / Asako Endo vs Lisa Adamek / Stephanie Tetrick3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHui Xu vs Erikka Arone7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesXiaohe Hao / Li Wang vs Anne Manicone / Michiko Kono1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJiandan Zheng / Yunda Huang vs Blaire Burman / Monica Spain6-4, 6-4
2026-01-10vs BC-BlochLost 13
L#1 DoublesYunda Huang / Xiaobei Li vs Annika Andrews / Louise Farrell0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAle Jimenez vs Wellesley Parker6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuper Sandy / Krystle Peeters vs Denise Angelone / Andreanna Kapogiannatos0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRama Karve / Xiaohe Hao vs Christine Bloch / Ana Reyes4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Ale Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jiandan Zheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Xiaobei Li
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.56
Super Sandy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Yunda Huang
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.48
2.44
Hui Xu
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.42
Xiaohe Hao
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.40
Asako Endo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.39
Krystle Peeters
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Rama Karve
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.26
Porsha Kahlon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Super Sandy + Krystle Peeters2448% games+5.6% vs expected
Porsha Kahlon + Asako Endo4447% games+0.3% vs expected
Jiandan Zheng + Xiaobei Li4449% games+0.1% vs expected
Asako Endo + Hui Xu3644% games−2.7% vs expected
Jiandan Zheng + Xiaohe Hao1935% games−3.2% vs expected
Jiandan Zheng + Yunda Huang4640% games−5.6% vs expected
Super Sandy + Jiandan Zheng224 matchesnot enough data
Super Sandy + Porsha Kahlon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ale Jimenez
16W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Jiandan Zheng
22W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Xiaobei Li
36W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Super Sandy
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Yunda Huang
44W–76L career · 7 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Stephanie Ellis-Smith
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Hui Xu
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Xiaohe Hao
19W–49L career · 7 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
3
Asako Endo
30W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
Krystle Peeters
2W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Rama Karve
4W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
3
Porsha Kahlon
6W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.