Teams

Saunders, Claire

2026 HOA Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-23vs Honeyman, SuzieLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Halter / Sandy Shino vs Jeni Schooley / Beth Wood0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Laura Lange vs Suzie Honeyman / Sun Jang7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Huddlestun / Sadie Putnam vs Kim Schrag / Jennifer Ng6-3, 6-4
2025-11-16vs Petersen, RachelWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Halter / Sandy Shino vs Kendra Vogel / Jennifer Lundquist2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Lindsey Klusman vs Maggie Young / Kelsey Thorp3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Huddlestun / Claire Saunders vs Ingrid Clarke / Alicia Miller6-2, 6-2
2025-11-09vs Stora, KiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Halter / Sadie Putnam vs Mindy Hamilton / Kia Stora6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Lindsey Klusman vs Ann Cronkhite / Margaret Enright6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Lange / Carey Mollet vs Anna Jordan-Douglass / Vicki McKeone6-7, 3-4
2025-11-02vs Caskey, KendaWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Huddlestun / Lindsey Klusman vs Sarah Gladstone / Janette Santizo3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Halter / Sandy Shino vs Priti Singh / Mary Beth Tudas6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Lange / Claire Saunders vs Vanessa Alpert / Kelly Jeffcote6-1, 6-1
2025-10-26vs Schwabauer, KellyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Halter / Emma Torgerson vs Ashley Prieb / Annie Brown6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSadie Putnam / Claire Saunders vs Krissi Wagner / Rachel Morrison4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Carey Mollet vs Carolyn Pirotte / Nina Whitmore4-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Loepp, KathyWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Huddlestun / Lindsey Klusman vs Diane Freeman / Alicia Fremont6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSandy Shino / Emma Torgerson vs Chris Westermajer / Carol Levalley6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Lange / Sadie Putnam vs Cathy Czir / Beth Strader6-2, 7-6
2025-10-12vs Evans, KarenWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Shino / Emma Torgerson vs Karen Evans / Janet Peard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Lange / Carey Mollet vs Elizabeth MacGonagle / Deborah Friesen6-2, 7-5
2025-10-05vs Norgren, JuliannaWon 21
L#1 DoublesClaire Saunders / Nancy Huddlestun vs Julianna Norgren / Jennifer Hedgecock6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSadie Putnam / Laura Lange vs Anne Lamberti / Christina Paquette6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Huiling Wei vs Jennifer Huddin / Jennifer Loe6-1, 6-1
2025-09-28vs Greber, JamieWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Halter / Lindsey Klusman vs Mariko Johnson / Emily Barclay3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSadie Putnam / Emma Torgerson vs Tanja Heinen / Jennifer Stottle6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarey Mollet / Huiling Wei vs Wendy Nyemaster / Dawn Nachbar6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Sadie Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Huiling Wei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Sandy Shino
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Emma Torgerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Lindsey Klusman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Jennifer Halter
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.85
Claire Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Nancy Huddlestun
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Laura Lange
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Carey Mollet
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Huddlestun + Claire Saunders4357% games+7.7% vs expected
Sandy Shino + Claire Saunders6260% games+1.8% vs expected
Sandy Shino + Jennifer Halter15853% games−0.8% vs expected
Nancy Huddlestun + Lindsey Klusman8255% games−3.5% vs expected
Laura Lange + Claire Saunders1444% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Huddlestun + Laura Lange303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Huddlestun + Jennifer Halter213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Lange + Carey Mollet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sadie Putnam
10W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Huiling Wei
9W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sandy Shino
52W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Emma Torgerson
15W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Lindsey Klusman
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jennifer Halter
41W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Claire Saunders
31W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Nancy Huddlestun
36W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Laura Lange
29W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Carey Mollet
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.