Teams

ELW Crushers

2021 Pinellas Social Mixed Fall · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-28vs Safety Harbor HueholtLost 12
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Kelly Hansen vs Chris Eversole / Patricia Beck7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJillene Davis / Steve Unger vs Ray Pasinski / Lisa Hueholt6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Penn / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Mikael Derderian / Emiliya Cogdill4-6, 3-6
2021-11-14vs McMullen Aces HighWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Dane Houston vs Lisa Oonk / Kyle Robertshaw6-1, 6-0
2021-11-07Split 11
L#1 DoublesSteve Unger / Aimee Bonnell vs Eugene Holliday / Christine Hammerschmidt1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / John Christison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Kirsten Willis vs Andy Svenson / Deanna Stuart7-6, 6-4
2021-10-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Rena Khawam vs James Plunkett / Trisha Shirkey6-0, 7-5
2021-10-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesDane Houston / Kelly Hansen vs Chris Eversole / Joy Evans6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Jillene Davis vs Jeffrey Biezunski / Dana Alexander6-3, 7-5
2021-09-20vs YMCA PerryWon 20
W#1 DoublesJillene Davis / Steve Unger vs Amy Brooks / William Hunter7-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / James Bettencourt vs John Noeske / Leah Knapp7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aimee Bonnell
published 4.5
4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.61
Precious Cabiling
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
James Bettencourt
published 3.5
3.14
Steve Unger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jillene Davis
published
Rena Khawam
published
Wendy Unger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dane Houston + Elizabeth Gerlach2355% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Willis + Dane Houston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aimee Bonnell
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.90
Precious Cabiling
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 3 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
James Bettencourt
15W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Steve Unger
105W–85L career · 6 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.