Teams

JLundberg-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs JByrd-NCCULost 02
L#1 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Brett Eckles2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Nicolas Quevedo0-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs SLlewellyn-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesZack Czajkowski vs Visakan Jayakumar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Ryan Sayko7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-10Split 11
L#1 SinglesStewart Bible vs Matthew Anderson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Weslander vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-03vs JClough-DFCWon 21
W#1 SinglesZack Czajkowski vs Eric Pollak6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Jeffrey Clough1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Rod Snyder6-0, 6-4
2026-05-27vs SLlewellyn-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesZack Czajkowski vs Kelvin Menezes5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMichael Weslander vs Ryan Sayko2-6, 4-6
2026-05-20vs JByrd-NCCULost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Weslander vs William Coulter6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStewart Bible vs Aaron Yip2-6, 3-6
2026-05-14vs GDichter-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesStewart Bible vs Sravan Narayan2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Alexis Maklakoff6-7, 2-6
2026-05-13vs MHanauer-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Raymond Xu7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Zack Czajkowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.11
Stewart Bible
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.06
Michael Weslander
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
4.04
Joshua Lundberg
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.01
Luc Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Al Pick
usually #3 Singles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Lundberg + Al Pick7169% games+12.1% vs expected
Michael Weslander + Stewart Bible314 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Lundberg + Luc Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
4.36
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
4
Michael Weslander
214W–93L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Joshua Lundberg
19W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Luc Sanchez
26W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Al Pick
75W–60L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.