Teams

Lee's Crossing (Denise Dickson)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-12-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesPamela Brown vs Laura DiTomasso3-6, 6-4, 6-3
2022-11-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPamela Brown vs Lauren Veres3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Brooke Hilyer
published 4.5
3.77
Young Howard
published
Carol Edwards
published 4
3.75
Kelly Hastings
published
3.69
Beth Hendrickson
published 4
3.66
Whitney Higuera
published
3.64
Angi Morrison
published 4
3.64
Lynn Anderson
published
3.54
Bridget Sanders
published 3.5
3.46
Cindy Burnham
published 3.5
3.28
Linda Montgomery
published
3.23
Toni Bailey
published
3.03
Christine Weisser
published 3.5
Pamela Brown
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Burnham + Lynn Anderson5155% games+3.0% vs expected
Lynn Anderson + Beth Hendrickson2353% games+0.6% vs expected
Bridget Sanders + Lynn Anderson242250% games−1.1% vs expected
Young Howard + Beth Hendrickson162250% games−3.2% vs expected
Bridget Sanders + Cindy Burnham134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Bailey + Cindy Burnham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Hilyer
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Young Howard
19W–27L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carol Edwards
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Hastings
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Beth Hendrickson
22W–36L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Whitney Higuera
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Angi Morrison
38W–23L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Lynn Anderson
49W–38L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Bridget Sanders
41W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Cindy Burnham
30W–45L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Linda Montgomery
17W–32L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.28
Toni Bailey
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Christine Weisser
2W–29L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Pamela Brown
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.