Teams

Kirsteins 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men 55 Wed

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-08vs Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesKen Questell / Tony Lancaster vs Philip Cooke / Kevin Dover6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Cohen / Lee Brogden vs Peter Novosad / Vince Credle2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEric Nocera / John Dutton vs Brad McAmis / Bill Vary5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJeff Hu / Cal Kimrey vs Joe Carruthers / Charles Bolton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBruce Eaton / Steve Bailey vs Frank Kincaid / Jeff Ingle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Dutton / Peter Glud vs Paul Nolan / John McCrary6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJason Beuchler / Ken Questell vs Steven Delamar / Timothy Shantry6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Smith / Peter Glud vs Ron Mangrum / Shiladitya Paul2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndy Kirsteins / Cal Kimrey vs Lee Schneiderman / Kenton Kreager4-6, 0-6
2025-09-17vs Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Hu / Tony Lancaster vs Charles Dawson / Martin Mailloux5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Kirsteins / John Dutton vs Jason Altmann / Jon Knight0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Bailey / Lee Brogden vs Peter Novosad / Matt Craig4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesPeter Cohen / Jason Beuchler vs Craig Wasserman / Charles Bolton7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTim Hayworth / Eric Nocera vs Stephen Miller / Scott Majestic3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Eaton / Jeff Hu vs Jeff Ingle / Paul Nolan6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesEric Nocera / Tim Hayworth vs Steven Delamar / Scott Wallace6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTony Lancaster / Ken Questell vs Ron Mangrum / Shiladitya Paul6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Glud / Lee Brogden vs Lee Schneiderman / Tom Barringer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-27vs Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Hu / Brian Smith vs Peter Novosad / David Grubbs2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEric Nocera / Tony Lancaster vs Jason Altmann / Vince Credle6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndy Kirsteins / Bruce Eaton vs Philip Cooke / Kevin Dover2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesPeter Cohen / Tim Hayworth vs Craig Wasserman / Charles Bolton1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTony Lancaster / Steve Bailey vs Stephen Miller / Scott Majestic7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Dutton / Lee Brogden vs Jeff Ingle / Frank Kincaid1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPeter Cohen / Jason Beuchler vs Rick Truell / Ron Mangrum7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKen Questell / Brian Smith vs Timothy Shantry / Scott Wallace6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBruce Eaton / Peter Glud vs Shiladitya Paul / Alejandro Rutty6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men 55 Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Peter Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Ken Questell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Eric Nocera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Jeff Hu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Jason Beuchler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Peter Glud
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Steve Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Tony Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Tim Hayworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Andy Kirsteins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Cal Kimrey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Bruce Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
John Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.03
Lee Brogden
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Lancaster + Ken Questell8750% games+1.8% vs expected
Andy Kirsteins + Cal Kimrey123 matchesnot enough data
Andy Kirsteins + Tony Lancaster033 matchesnot enough data
Jason Beuchler + Peter Cohen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Cohen
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Ken Questell
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Eric Nocera
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Jeff Hu
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Jason Beuchler
35W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Peter Glud
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Steve Bailey
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Tony Lancaster
27W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Tim Hayworth
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Andy Kirsteins
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cal Kimrey
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bruce Eaton
22W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
John Dutton
22W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Lee Brogden
7W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.