Teams

BC-LLW-AltaVista/GayleHollenbaugh

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-13vs BC-ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsLost 01
L#2 SinglesRuedeemard Odanaka vs Abbigail Fietzer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-06vs BC-WestEnd/JudySchultzWon 10
W#2 SinglesRuedeemard Odanaka vs Anne Bayne4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-30vs BC-ElDorado/YukaHiroseWon 10
W#2 SinglesRuedeemard Odanaka vs Karina Kraines6-2, 6-4
2021-05-23vs BC-ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsWon 20
W#1 SinglesRuedeemard Odanaka vs Nkechinyere Obih6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCindy Campbell / Yolanda Legro vs Abbigail Fietzer / Erica Perkins6-3, 6-1
2021-05-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Ford / Masami Hashimoto vs Sueli Holmes / Caroline Sullivan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-02vs BC-ElDorado/YukaHiroseWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Ford / Masami Hashimoto vs Sally Namie / Takiko Phinizy6-3, 6-2
2021-04-25vs BC-ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsWon 20
W#2 SinglesRuedeemard Odanaka vs Abbigail Fietzer6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Ford / Masami Hashimoto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-18vs BC-WestEnd/JudySchultzLost 01
L#2 SinglesMasami Hashimoto vs Aki Eguchi2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Carolyn Atchison
published 5
4.61
Maria Lupu
published
4.42
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
4.34
Yolanda Legro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Luanne Quiggle
published
4.28
Cindy Campbell
published 4.5
4.28
Elaine Chan
published 4.5
Gayle Hollenbaugh
published 4.5
4.18
Masami Hashimoto
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Kelly Ford
published
4.07
Michelle L Hughes
published
4.06
Ruedeemard Odanaka
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Kathy Lundberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruedeemard Odanaka + Masami Hashimoto3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carolyn Atchison
64W–35L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.63
Maria Lupu
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.61
4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Yolanda Legro
42W–28L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
Luanne Quiggle
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Cindy Campbell
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Elaine Chan
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Gayle Hollenbaugh
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Masami Hashimoto
108W–127L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Kelly Ford
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
Michelle L Hughes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
4.07
4.5
Ruedeemard Odanaka
98W–95L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.06
Kathy Lundberg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.