Teams

Young at Heart

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-01vs Sweet Shots 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesCharlene Pascual / Malia Wong vs Joy KAMANO / Hanna Wilson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerrie Ikehara / Merle Yoshino vs Anne Gleason / Ipolani Wright6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Ryan / Sheila Tamura vs Frances Calantoc / Lynn Hatada6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-26vs Sweet Shots 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTerrie Ikehara / Malia Wong vs Frances Calantoc / Marleen Cabarloc6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMildred Kaneshiro / Jeanne Harano-Hernandez vs Tomoko Fuselier / Hanna Wilson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAiko Mitchel / Susan Nakamura-Koge vs Anne Gleason / Ipolani Wright5-7, 4-6
2024-05-11vs Hilo GurlzLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerrie Ikehara / Malia Wong vs Marianne Takamiya / Andrea Ueno1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanne Harano-Hernandez / Mary Ryan vs Lisa Lei Ishikawa / Junette Nakamura1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAiko Mitchel / Sheila Tamura vs Estrelita Young / Debra Tatsuno1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-05vs Hilo GurlzLost 12
L#1 DoublesMildred Kaneshiro / Merle Yoshino vs Lisa Lei Ishikawa / Marianne Takamiya1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Harano-Hernandez / Charlene Pascual vs Erin Kihara / Diane Noda6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGaylien Fujioka / Darnella Villanueva vs Debra Tatsuno / Estrelita Young3-6, 2-6
2024-04-24vs Sweet Shots 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesReiko Hamano / Malia Wong vs Sharon Chong / Lori Yamamoto6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCharlene Pascual / Terrie Ikehara vs Tomoko Fuselier / Hanna Wilson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Ryan / Darnella Villanueva vs Marleen Cabarloc / Frances Calantoc4-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs Hilo GurlzLost 12
L#1 DoublesMalia Wong / Merle Yoshino vs Erin Kihara / Diane Noda6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMildred Kaneshiro / Susan Nakamura-Koge vs Sabina Wery / Patti Taira-Tokuuke6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGaylien Fujioka / Sheila Tamura vs Andrea Ueno / Estrelita Young6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Sheila Tamura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Merle Yoshino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Malia Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Terrie Ikehara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Jeanne Harano-Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.94
Susan Nakamura-Koge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Darnella Villanueva
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Mary Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Charlene Pascual
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Aiko Mitchel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Toni Sakai-Kawada
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gaylien Fujioka
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Mildred Kaneshiro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Reiko Hamano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aiko Mitchel + Jeanne Harano-Hernandez8269% games+18.1% vs expected
Aiko Mitchel + Susan Nakamura-Koge4450% games+8.6% vs expected
Malia Wong + Jeanne Harano-Hernandez4255% games+6.2% vs expected
Merle Yoshino + Charlene Pascual5264% games+5.9% vs expected
Terrie Ikehara + Malia Wong6451% games+5.5% vs expected
Sheila Tamura + Malia Wong7063% games+5.1% vs expected
Jeanne Harano-Hernandez + Susan Nakamura-Koge3445% games+3.0% vs expected
Charlene Pascual + Susan Nakamura-Koge3643% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sheila Tamura
33W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Merle Yoshino
76W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Malia Wong
65W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Terrie Ikehara
25W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jeanne Harano-Hernandez
68W–96L career · 7 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Nakamura-Koge
81W–96L career · 6 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Darnella Villanueva
95W–136L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Mary Ryan
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Charlene Pascual
53W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Aiko Mitchel
54W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Toni Sakai-Kawada
47W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
2.67
Gaylien Fujioka
48W–66L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mildred Kaneshiro
29W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Reiko Hamano
39W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.