Teams

2.MD.Cox

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-21vs 3.TOC.CuccaroLost 01
L#1 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Amy Beth Kessinger2-6, 0-6
2022-04-30vs 5.TOC.KempfLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Crichton / Dori Mcdarris vs Meryl Golder / Jeme Avent3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-20vs 1.LOCH.KasbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesDori Mcdarris / Kelly Williams vs Li Zhuang / Thaiza Gloer7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-02vs 6.TOC.SziksaiWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Crichton / Dori Mcdarris vs Zana Piric / Dara Haney6-1, 6-0
2022-03-26vs 3.TOC.CuccaroSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Crichton / Dori Mcdarris vs Kay Kajiwara / Erika Bailey7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Griffin / Meredith Kinkle vs Rosalind Manning / Amy Wolfe4-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs 5.TOC.KempfSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Crichton / Dori Mcdarris vs Jane Williams / Maggie Wang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Cesta / Meredith Kinkle vs Allison Graves / Jeme Avent3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.65
Dori Mcdarris
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Donna Reiser
published 3.5
3.47
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
3.37
Lisa Griffin
published
3.28
Meredith Kinkle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Claire Cesta
published 3.5
Kathleen Cannon
published
Paige Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Reinke + Donna Reiser303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Lee
35W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Dori Mcdarris
89W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Donna Reiser
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Christine Reinke
49W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Lisa Griffin
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
63W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Claire Cesta
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.