Teams

Crosstown Connection Too

Tri-Level · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Chiodo / Brian Miklavic vs Michael Godfrey / Aashish Jog4-6, 2-6
2022-02-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Miklavic / Evan Perilstein vs Kevin Duffy / Meng Lee6-1, 6-4
2022-02-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Aliano / Brian Miklavic vs Michael Godfrey / Todd Walker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Miklavic / Jacob Braun vs Aashish Jog / Tim Lloyd7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Aliano / Jerry Hodge vs Aashish Jog / Todd Walker2-6, 0-6
2022-01-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Miklavic / Evan Perilstein vs Kevin Duffy / Keith Duffy6-3, 6-0
2021-12-26vs Crosstown ConnectionLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Abel / Charles Orr vs Dominic Costa / Matthew Paat5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-12-19vs Crosstown ConnectionLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Dansak / Christopher Woods vs Nathan Wang / Zachary Pivirotto4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Miklavic / Richard Ting vs Jacob Braun / Chris Proud6-4, 4-6, 2-6
2021-11-28vs Crosstown ConnectionLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Orr / Christopher Woods vs David Dwornick / Dominic Costa4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Ting / Anthony Aliano vs Chris Proud / Jacob Braun3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Crosstown Connection Too03271489

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Christopher Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Kurran Singh
published
3.31
Brian Miklavic
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Richard Ting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Anthony Aliano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charles Orr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Abel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Woods
71W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Kurran Singh
47W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
4.09
3.5
Brian Miklavic
44W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Richard Ting
27W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anthony Aliano
29W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Charles Orr
6W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Abel
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.