Teams

WNCJ Woodhouse (HRC)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40 & O 3.0 Women Thursday evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-09vs WNCK McDill (ARC S)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Thompson / Janet Foster vs Sally Boerschig / Virginia Scarola0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Henderson / Amy Donaldson vs Sammie Vittoria / Tammy Wrenn6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnna Stark / Heidi Rundquist vs Melanie Blonshine / Jennifer Malt5-7, 3-6
2025-05-01vs WNCC Connell (Aston)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichal Baird / MeLani Campos vs Melissa Johnson / Amanda Ashbrook6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesXaymara Herrera / Heidi Rundquist vs Kate Martin / Molly Russell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Donaldson / Janet Foster vs Summer Barlow / Susanne Loar4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-26vs WNCC Connell (Aston)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Bowdren / Arianna Bovo Trnka vs Catharine Connell / Elizabeth Vega6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandy Thompson / Amy Donaldson vs Summer Barlow / Laura Martin6-1, 6-2
2025-04-23vs WNCC Connell (Aston)Won 21
W#1 DoublesArianna Bovo Trnka / Heidi Rundquist vs Susanne Loar / Petra Steinbuchel6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandy Thompson / Maureen Bowdren vs Elizabeth Vega / Ruthann Tensi6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Stark / Janet Foster vs Catharine Connell / Laura Martin3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs WNCK McDill (ARC S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMeLani Campos / Arianna Bovo Trnka vs Emily Richter / Virginia Scarola6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaureen Bowdren / Janet Foster vs Kimberly Waggle / Holly Renfro3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Henderson / Anna Stark vs Sammie Vittoria / Debbie Berry4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-03vs WNCJ Gillis (ARC S)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesArianna Bovo Trnka / MeLani Campos vs Jennifer Gillis / Miluska Kusz5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnna Stark / Sandy Thompson vs Kirby Finger / Hallie Gray3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Rundquist / Xaymara Herrera vs Patricia van Vonno / Paula Mabunga3-6, 5-7
2025-04-02vs WNCJ Gillis (ARC S)Won 21
L#1 DoublesXaymara Herrera / Maureen Bowdren vs Miluska Kusz / Jennifer Gillis1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Henderson / Michal Baird vs Pamela Bruner / Jennifer German6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesArianna Bovo Trnka / Amy Donaldson vs Paula Mabunga / Angela Weilbaecher6-0, 6-0
2025-04-02vs WNCK McDill (ARC S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichal Baird / Janet Foster vs Sally Boerschig / Kimberly Waggle6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHeidi Rundquist / Anna Stark vs Kelly McDill / Tammy Wrenn7-5, 1-4
L#3 DoublesXaymara Herrera / Cheryl Cha-Cha Soloff vs Virginia Scarola / Emily Richter3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & O 3.0 Women Thursday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Anna Stark
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Michal Baird
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Amy Donaldson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cheryl Cha-Cha Soloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Maureen Bowdren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Arianna Bovo Trnka
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Heidi Rundquist
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Xaymara Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Foster
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
MeLani Campos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arianna Bovo Trnka + Maureen Bowdren1445% games+0.7% vs expected
Xaymara Herrera + Heidi Rundquist4351% games−5.1% vs expected
Arianna Bovo Trnka + Heidi Rundquist123 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Rundquist + Anna Stark123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Stark
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Michal Baird
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Amy Donaldson
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Cheryl Cha-Cha Soloff
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Bowdren
10W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Arianna Bovo Trnka
15W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Heidi Rundquist
9W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Xaymara Herrera
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Janet Foster
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
MeLani Campos
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.