Teams

CTL18/Haskell/CTFC

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Women - 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Carpenter
published 5
4.41
Laura Plyler
published
4.29
Carlynn Musil
published 4.5
4.04
Donna Saleeby
published
3.97
Amy Redfield
published 4
3.89
Caty Garside
published 4
3.88
Allie Boland
published 4
3.86
Emilee McLauchlin
published
3.80
Megan Freiburger
published
3.79
Jana Xanthakos
published
3.63
Lisa Dahlquist
published
3.21
Amy Beall
published 4
Mary Ellen Potter
published
Meghan Cole
published
Michelle Haskell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caty Garside + Jana Xanthakos5075% games+16.6% vs expected
Caty Garside + Laura Plyler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Abby Carpenter
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Plyler
50W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Carlynn Musil
32W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
Donna Saleeby
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Amy Redfield
68W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.97
4
Caty Garside
85W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Allie Boland
75W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Emilee McLauchlin
48W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Megan Freiburger
19W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Jana Xanthakos
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Lisa Dahlquist
60W–36L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Amy Beall
63W–37L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.21
Mary Ellen Potter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Cole
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Haskell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.