Teams

Fink - Tatum

2025 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-13vs Racquet ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelinda Robinson / Shana Lane vs Renee Dozier / Wendi Johnson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie C Fink / Alison Chandler vs Danielle Black / Mary Jo Goodin6-7, 2-6
2025-10-02vs Racquet ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandi Harper / Saia Stetelman vs Elizabeth Asmar / Wendi Johnson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Fortenberry / Shana Lane vs Ashley Majors / Tracy Speights3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKim Wise / Carly Wise vs Susan Shemper / Tina Boykin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-30vs Racquet ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelinda Robinson / Brandi Harper vs Danielle Black / Mary Jo Goodin2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShana Lane / Melanie C Fink vs Karol St Louis / Robin Hudson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Carly Wise
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Melanie C Fink
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Saia Stetelman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Melinda Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kim Wise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alison Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Brandi Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Shana Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Mary Carole Kiewit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Fortenberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Madison Shows
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shana Lane + Kimberly Fortenberry044 matchesnot enough data
Alison Chandler + Melanie C Fink123 matchesnot enough data
Carly Wise + Melanie C Fink303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Wise
23W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Melanie C Fink
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Saia Stetelman
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Melinda Robinson
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Kim Wise
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alison Chandler
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brandi Harper
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Shana Lane
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Mary Carole Kiewit
16W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Kimberly Fortenberry
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Madison Shows
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.