Teams

Rickert - Southwoods

2025 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (West)

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-05vs IA/Boyer/Mid-TriMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Brick / Jeff Ditsworth vs Michael Boyer / Timothy Derouin0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Fautsch / Matthew Whipps vs Richard Heil / Nathan Geer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Rickert / Tim Brunkhorst vs Peter Winterton / Caleb Brown3-6, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Jha & Hanson - SouthwoodsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Jeff Smith vs Sebastien Feve / Antonio Martinez4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / David Fautsch vs Anil Jha / Brent Hanson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTim Brunkhorst / Todd Versteeg vs John Micka / Hector Aquino6-3, 6-2
2025-07-15vs Pham & Whipp - Johnston HSWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Matt Desmarais vs Adam Rothert / Caleb Hamerlinck6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / David Brick vs Martin Fisher Jr / Dominick Rath6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTodd Versteeg / Brian Rickert vs Max Wilker / Dinesh Keshwani6-3, 6-4
2025-07-08vs IA/Boyer/Mid-TriMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Desmarais / Jeffrey Malik vs Michael Boyer / Jack Edwards4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Rickert / David Brick vs Ryan Staiert / Ryan Krabbe0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTim Brunkhorst / Ryan Rolwes vs Nick Stahly / Nathan Johnston4-6, 6-7
2025-07-01vs Jha & Hanson - SouthwoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Desmarais / Jeffrey Malik vs Blake Schneider / Antonio Martinez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Brick / Matthew Whipps vs Brent Hanson / Ayush Jha2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTodd Versteeg / Tim Brunkhorst vs Neal Molitor / John Micka4-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs Pham & Whipp - Johnston HSWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Matt Desmarais vs Martin Fisher Jr / Adam Rothert6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Brick / David Fautsch vs Dan Determan / Dominick Rath2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTodd Versteeg / Ryan Rolwes vs Max Wilker / Jack Miller6-4, 6-3
2025-06-17vs IA/Boyer/Mid-TriMLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Jeffrey Malik vs Michael Boyer / Joel Heil2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Brick / Matthew Whipps vs Sean Soupiset / Nathan Geer0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Rickert / Ryan Rolwes vs Nick Stahly / Peter Winterton4-6, 4-6
2025-06-10vs Jha & Hanson - SouthwoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Smith / Matt Desmarais vs Sebastien Feve / Scott Peterson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Brian Rickert vs Brent Hanson / Ayush Jha6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Brunkhorst / Todd Versteeg vs Bryce Johnson / John Micka3-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs Pham & Whipp - Johnston HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Jeff Smith vs Robert Woody / Adam Rothert2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / David Brick vs Vincent Garcia / Martin Fisher Jr4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Brunkhorst / Todd Versteeg vs Michael Hutchison / Max Wilker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (West) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Jeffrey Malik
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Jeff Ditsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Matt Desmarais
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.76
David Fautsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Matthew Whipps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
David Brick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.48
Todd Versteeg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Ryan Rolwes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tim Brunkhorst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Brian Rickert
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Brunkhorst + Brian Rickert6649% games+1.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Malik + Jeff Ditsworth3750% games−0.5% vs expected
David Brick + Matthew Whipps2538% games−9.3% vs expected
Matt Desmarais + Jeff Ditsworth2345% gamesnot enough data
Tim Brunkhorst + Todd Versteeg134 matchesnot enough data
Brian Rickert + Todd Versteeg134 matchesnot enough data
David Brick + Jeff Ditsworth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jeffrey Malik
12W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Jeff Ditsworth
47W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Matt Desmarais
17W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
David Fautsch
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Brick
53W–68L career · 10 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Todd Versteeg
40W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Ryan Rolwes
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tim Brunkhorst
40W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brian Rickert
20W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.