Teams

BC-MCC/RachelAlexander

2025 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-09vs BC-Kramer/TanyaDrawerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Ellen Lauricella vs Danielle Raymond / Jennifer Giordano2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-26vs BC-LLW-MCC/SarahSautotLost 01
L#1 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Anne Lee vs Laura Murray / Gavie McCooey3-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs BC-MiraCosta/PamelaHayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesFaye Cavanaugh / Erin Freeman vs Chiaki Maeda / Yukiko Hawley4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Graham / Kristina Mohr vs Stephanie Rudy / Caitlin Fredericks4-6, 0-6
2025-10-12vs BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Tinker / Kimberly Graham vs Rebecca Chavira / Jennifer Siegal6-2, 7-6
2025-10-05vs BC-AltaVista/TracyCostantinoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFaye Cavanaugh / Ethylene Ziegler vs Tracy Costantino / Tami Reyes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Alexander / Kimberly Graham vs Ryan Hickman / Denise Gocke2-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs BC-WestEnd/NoreenWenjenWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Tinker / Kimberly Graham vs Pamela Milroy / Diane Kaiser6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEthylene Ziegler / Faye Cavanaugh vs Xiaozhen Yuan / Noreen Wenjen7-5, 6-3
2025-09-14vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Freeman / Elizabeth Alexander vs Mary DeVlugt / Anita Liu6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRenee Tinker / Kimberly Graham vs Stacy Tzur / Kerri Reed7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kelly Gores
published
3.82
Angela Dax
published 4
3.73
Renee Tinker
published
3.71
Mariel VandenHengel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Robin Terry
published
3.69
Denise Coit
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Linda Lai
published
3.68
Elizabeth Alexander
published
3.68
Faye Cavanaugh
published
3.56
Layla Kiffin
published
3.53
Ellen Lauricella
published
3.52
Frances Nelson
published
3.51
Taylor Rayfield
published
3.51
Kristina Mohr
published
3.50
Jenny Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Erin Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Julie Watts
published
3.37
Anne Lee
published 3.5
3.20
Kimberly Graham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
Julie Tendoesschate
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Freeman + Ethylene Ziegler123 matchesnot enough data
Ethylene Ziegler + Kimberly Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Gores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Angela Dax
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mariel VandenHengel
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
87W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Robin Terry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Denise Coit
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Linda Lai
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Faye Cavanaugh
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Layla Kiffin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Ellen Lauricella
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Frances Nelson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Taylor Rayfield
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jenny Jackson
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Erin Freeman
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Julie Watts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Anne Lee
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kimberly Graham
38W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Julie Tendoesschate
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.