Teams

Gundell/Seelig

2026 Women's Day League · 3.5 - Fall

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-06-09vs West/UlinLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Marie Chandra vs Amrita Pendharkar / Shabnam Hariri7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Ansell / Michele Hootstein vs Lien Do / Haynee Johnson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Gundell / Jill Seelig vs Marjorie Adams / Jaime Fliman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Jane Gundell vs Lien Do / Susan West6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-27vs West/UlinLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Groveman / Michele Hootstein vs Lindsay Blanco / Stephanie Manheim1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Meghan Astrachan vs Jaime Fliman / Shabnam Hariri6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ansell / Jill Seelig vs Haynee Johnson / Susan West4-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs West/UlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarie Chandra / Leigh Flayton vs Alicia Ulin / Amrita Pendharkar6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Borrelle / Jane Groveman vs Haynee Johnson / Susan West6-0, 7-6
2026-05-07vs West/UlinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Marie Chandra vs Lindsay Blanco / Stephanie Manheim6-7, 5-4
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ansell / Meghan Astrachan vs Marjorie Adams / Jaime Fliman4-6, 3-6
2026-04-29vs West/UlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Gundell / Leigh Flayton vs Amrita Pendharkar / Alicia Ulin7-5, 4-5
2026-03-02vs Ziluca/BonillaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Jane Gundell vs Lea Lasman / Marki Zabar5-7, 5-5
W#3 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Amanda Ansell vs Kelsey Karsten / Deanna D'Amore5-7, 6-2
2026-02-26vs West/UlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Marie Chandra vs Alicia Ulin / Diana Gershuny6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Groveman / Jill Seelig vs Haynee Johnson / Susan West3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-12vs Welles/GouldWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Mansfield / Leigh Flayton vs Jasmine Barr / Lauren Hanin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLesley Miller / Jane Groveman vs Radhika Rathore / Susan Zeigler6-0, 6-3
2026-02-03vs Ziluca/BonillaLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Amanda Ansell vs Cynthia Goodstein / Joanna Hershon3-6, 3-6
2026-01-29vs West/UlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarie Chandra / Leigh Flayton vs Lindsay Blanco / Alicia Ulin6-7, 4-2
W#3 DoublesJill Seelig / Jane Gundell vs ELLEN STEIN / Susan West6-0, 6-4
2026-01-22vs Welles/GouldWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Marie Chandra vs Jasmine Barr / Natasha Caronna6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Seelig / Amanda Ansell vs Ingrid Bateman / Karen Flagg5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJane Groveman / Lorri Ahl vs Jasmine Corona / Tracey Amdur5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Leigh Flayton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Tracey Amdur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jane Gundell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Christina Mott
published 3.5
3.11
Jane Groveman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Amanda Ansell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jill Seelig
published
Meghan Astrachan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Flayton + Jane Gundell4449% games−3.7% vs expected
Jane Groveman + Leigh Flayton4348% games−8.0% vs expected
Jane Gundell + Jill Seelig224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leigh Flayton
144W–80L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Tracey Amdur
53W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jane Gundell
32W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christina Mott
56W–46L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jane Groveman
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amanda Ansell
56W–76L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jill Seelig
17W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Astrachan
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.