Teams

GEPTA/Bezemek/55&over/8.0M

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Bezemek/55&over/8.0M7118616168
2GEPTA/55&over/8.0MMaese/EPTC#11761838257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Mike Caldarella
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Art Bejar
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.35
Armando Gallego
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Michael Bezemek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Richard Castillo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ruben Alba
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
SIMON SILVA
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Trevor Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Haynes + Michael Bezemek5849% games−3.0% vs expected
Michael Bezemek + Richard Castillo3544% gamesnot enough data
Steven Haynes + Ray Bonds3354% gamesnot enough data
Steven Haynes + Armando Gallego5158% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Michael Kotowski6064% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Trevor Rivera2349% gamesnot enough data
Steven Haynes + Michael Kotowski314 matchesnot enough data
Ray Bonds + Armando Gallego134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Caldarella
41W–40L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Art Bejar
42W–34L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
Armando Gallego
20W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Michael Bezemek
102W–87L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
130W–48L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Bonds
67W–58L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Castillo
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruben Alba
6W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
SIMON SILVA
35W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Haynes
80W–58L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trevor Rivera
39W–47L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.