Teams

Sports Mall-Wood

2026 Winter League-Weekday · 3.5W AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.22 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-17vs Frozen RacketsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Chelsea Wood vs Jennifer Tooley / Paige Smathers2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather George / Miche Ferrin vs Hannah Lee / Kathi Poggi6-4, 3-1
2026-03-10vs Park City-Pfeiffer/KruegerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsay Lafeen / Sarah Nelson vs Lori Pfeiffer / Dannan Siano5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Chelsea Wood vs Kelly Krueger / Sarah Yates7-6, 2-3, 0-1
2026-03-03vs Sports Mall-Farr/GreenLost 04
L#1 DoublesChelsea Wood / Lisa Packer vs Lexi Farr / Brenda Green2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Pizza / Miche Ferrin vs Nicole Reese / Michelle Edwards2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Naomi Stroud-Peterson vs Bethany Bodily / Emily Kelly0-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRikke Phinney / Marni Larsen vs Jamie Harris / Julie Labrum3-6, 1-6
2026-02-24vs Cottonwood Club-AnnunziataLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Chelsea Wood vs Jane Woolley / Kerry Davis4-6, 2-6
2026-02-17vs Sports Mall-Lake/KnowltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Packer / Chelsea Wood vs Debra Knowlton / Lisa Beames3-6, 1-5
L#4 DoublesMarni Larsen / Rikke Phinney vs Yoko Walljasper / Kaitlyn Willmore1-6, 3-6
2026-02-10vs LP-LombardiLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Lafeen / Sarah Nelson vs Ann Weaver / Robin Simmons6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Chelsea Wood vs Kelly Webster / Bessy Nielson4-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMelanie Olsen / Marni Larsen vs Chelsea Spencer / Carrie Larsen3-6, 1-6
2026-01-27vs Frozen RacketsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Duckworth / Catherine van Uitert vs Ann Trentman / Shelly Kemp6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChelsea Wood / Lisa Packer vs Jamie DeLong / Allison Leishman2-6, 5-4, 1-0
2026-01-20vs Park City-Pfeiffer/KruegerLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Lindsay Lafeen vs Dannan Siano / Lori Pfeiffer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Packer / Chelsea Wood vs Kelly Krueger / Kristina Dell'Orco2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Duckworth / Catherine van Uitert vs Hillary Jeppsen / Sarah Yates6-1, 2-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Kassie Butt
published 3.5
3.40
Catherine van Uitert
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Lindsay Duckworth
usually #4 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.11
Miche Ferrin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Lindsay Lafeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Rikke Phinney
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Chelsea Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Melanie Olsen
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.79
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.77
Marni Larsen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Heather George
published 3
2.66
Lindsey Pizza
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.59
Rachel Stohlton
usually #4 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Lisa Packer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Duckworth + Lindsey Pizza4453% games+9.0% vs expected
Lindsey Pizza + Rachel Stohlton4943% games+7.1% vs expected
Marni Larsen + Melanie Olsen1735% games−0.6% vs expected
Chelsea Wood + Miche Ferrin21140% games−0.9% vs expected
Melanie Olsen + Rachel Stohlton0727% games−7.4% vs expected
Catherine van Uitert + Lindsay Duckworth224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Duckworth + Rachel Stohlton134 matchesnot enough data
Naomi Stroud-Peterson + Kassie Butt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kassie Butt
72W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lindsay Duckworth
43W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Miche Ferrin
15W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lindsay Lafeen
32W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Rikke Phinney
44W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Chelsea Wood
63W–113L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Melanie Olsen
62W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
139W–157L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Marni Larsen
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.77
3
Heather George
16W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Lindsey Pizza
38W–53L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Rachel Stohlton
16W–57L career · 10 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lisa Packer
38W–49L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.