Teams

HOA/Muller/55&Over6.0W

2023 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-17vs Elving, BeverlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Klein / Megan Viviano vs Claire Saunders / Laura Lange6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Carle / Sabrina Alexander vs Deborah Ruggles / Diane Strahl6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Jane Olson vs Cathy Moyer / Julia Flynn6-2, 6-1
2023-06-10vs Harkleroad, IreneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaryanne Loscalzo / Kimberly Sanders vs Connie Skeens / Keyna Chertoff6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi McIntyre / Imelda Tooey vs LOIS HERR / Edgy Sack6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Barbara Yarns vs Monica Levens / Angela Marks6-3, 7-6
2023-05-20vs Elving, BeverlyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Viviano / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Pam Dunaway / Diane Strahl2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSonya Muller / Barbara Yarns vs Cynthia Pfeiffer / Deborah Ruggles6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSabrina Alexander / Christine Carle vs Trish Fox / Julia Flynn7-6, 6-0
2023-05-13vs Harkleroad, IreneLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Kim Klein vs LOIS HERR / Edgy Sack6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSabrina Alexander / Kim Pulford vs Keyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Carle / Diane Phillips vs Monica Levens / Angela Marks6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs Elving, BeverlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi McIntyre / Megan Viviano vs Cynthia Pfeiffer / Pam Dunaway7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesImelda Tooey / Barbara Yarns vs ANNETTE LEPIQUE / Deborah Ruggles6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Sonya Muller vs Beverly Elving / Jacqueline King6-2, 7-5
2023-04-22vs Harkleroad, IreneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryanne Loscalzo / Jane Olson vs Elizabeth Barnes / Donetta Shaner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanet Crawford / Kimberly Sanders vs Angela Marks / Mary Marks6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Kim Pulford vs Keyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Muller/55&Over6.0W5114410130
2Harkleroad, Irene4210818152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Sonya Muller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Kim Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Heidi McIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.82
Diane Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Imelda Tooey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Janet Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.75
Maryanne Loscalzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Yarns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Megan Viviano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Ann Cronkhite
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Kim Pulford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Christine Carle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jane Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sabrina Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Cronkhite + Kim Pulford4846% games+2.8% vs expected
Kimberly Sanders + Megan Viviano2346% games+1.7% vs expected
Ann Cronkhite + Diane Phillips4256% games+0.6% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Sonya Muller3350% games−1.2% vs expected
Kimberly Sanders + Heidi McIntyre1439% games−2.1% vs expected
Sonya Muller + Megan Viviano61441% games−4.8% vs expected
Megan Viviano + Heidi McIntyre3348% games−6.9% vs expected
Jane Olson + Maryanne Loscalzo21034% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonya Muller
70W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kim Klein
49W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Heidi McIntyre
50W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Diane Phillips
31W–26L career · 1 line in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Imelda Tooey
19W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Janet Crawford
59W–74L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Maryanne Loscalzo
28W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barbara Yarns
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Viviano
59W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ann Cronkhite
46W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kim Pulford
27W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Christine Carle
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Olson
7W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Sanders
12W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sabrina Alexander
23W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.