Teams

CCRC - Liebel

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesDenise Daniel / Tania Matos vs Patty Herring / Debra Pisarczyk1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Angela Stillwell vs Susan Podolin / Carol Jensen4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lyons / Michele Rumbaugh vs Jane Hemingway / Michelle Campbell4-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs Odell Weeks - GregoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Haddow- Liebel / Denise Daniel vs Ann Fago / Susan Watson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ellen Earwood / Cathy Sirmans vs Carolyn McCarthy / Emily Hanna6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Fulton / Tania Matos vs Tracy Conlon / Sallie Brinkley4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDenise Daniel / Pam Ciamillo vs Carol Jensen / Michelle Campbell0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Fulton / Tania Matos vs Jane Hemingway / Molly Hunt4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lyons / Michele Rumbaugh vs Sharon McKool / Susan Podolin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Odell Weeks - GregoryWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Fulton / Pam Ciamillo vs Nancy Looney / Carolyn McCarthy6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lyons / Cathy Sirmans vs Agnes Hobson / Gina Konn6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDenise Daniel / Angela Stillwell vs Carol Jensen / Michelle Campbell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPam Ciamillo / Sara Haddow- Liebel vs Susan Podolin / Sharon McKool1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Rumbaugh / Mary Ellen Earwood vs Jane Hemingway / Lorraine Gardner7-6, 6-4
2025-02-09vs Odell Weeks - GregoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Daniel / Angela Stillwell vs Emily Hanna / Ann Fago6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ellen Earwood / Cathy Sirmans vs Lindsey Wilkinson / Gina Konn6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Fulton / Tania Matos vs Tracy Conlon / Karen Skiff6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Karen Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Mary Ellen Earwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Sara Haddow- Liebel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Adrienne Davis
published 3.5
3.21
Pam Ciamillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Angela Stillwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Cathy Sirmans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Michele Rumbaugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Tania Matos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Laurie Pysczynski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Fulton + Tania Matos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Fulton
46W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Mary Ellen Earwood
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sara Haddow- Liebel
45W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Adrienne Davis
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Ciamillo
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Angela Stillwell
26W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cathy Sirmans
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Michele Rumbaugh
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Tania Matos
36W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Laurie Pysczynski
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.