Teams

Harberson - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs Etscheid - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Washington / Jennifer Bollinger vs Karen Crane / Frances Haswell5-7, 2-6
2025-06-10vs Leonard - RS HardSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElaine Hayward / Samantha Motley vs Kiley Leonard / Olivia Johnson6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSusan Harberson vs Rhonda Springer2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTRISH STOKES vs Reghan Robinson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAtchara Barrows / Shirley Anderson vs Lisa Streete / Lindsey Chadbourne6-2, 6-4
2025-05-29vs Ross - RS HardWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Washington / Donna Underdonk vs Fernanda Zamorano Rozas / Heysi Mcmillon6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs Lochas - RS HardWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Washington / Jennifer Bollinger vs Kristen Sitton / Wendi Best6-3, 6-3
2025-05-15vs Schweigert - PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Washington / Susan Harberson vs Debra Neethling / Elizabeth Dudney4-6, 4-6
2025-05-08vs Maclean - SHLLost 14
W#1 DoublesSamantha Motley / Elaine Hayward vs Maryellen MacLean / Liz Edlund6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTRISH STOKES vs Cara Tenpenny2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Harberson / Shirley Anderson vs Samantha Lee Kuhn / Hunter Strobel0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDonna Underdonk vs Haley Papajohn0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAtchara Barrows / ERIKA PHAN-LUNG vs Susan Sasser / Sarah Marsden2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-01vs Wilson - RS HardLost 01
L#2 DoublesAtchara Barrows / Michelle Washington vs Jill Wilson / Margaret Menear1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Carmen White
published 3
Atchara Barrows
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Elaine Hayward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Michelle Washington
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
ERIKA PHAN-LUNG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Donna Underdonk
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Shirley Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Harberson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
TRISH STOKES
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carmen White
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Atchara Barrows
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elaine Hayward
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Michelle Washington
44W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
ERIKA PHAN-LUNG
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Donna Underdonk
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Anderson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Harberson
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
TRISH STOKES
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.