Teams

DIABLO CC CW7.5A-DT

2024 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Julie Wallunas
published
3.74
Andrea Callaway
published 4
3.65
Tracy Arnaudon
published
3.61
Madeleine Johnson
published
3.55
Laura Gallagher
published
3.54
Veronica Butcher
published
3.42
Vicki Riherd
published
3.42
Jodie Dowling
published
3.38
Catherine Griffin
published 3.5
3.33
Sia McDonald
published
3.30
Heather Schulte
published
3.30
Nancy Daetz
published
3.28
Bridget Ivanov
published 3.5
Andrea Challinor
published 3.5
3.25
Rochelle Rich
published
3.21
Marilee Headen
published
3.14
Kelly McQueen
published
3.13
Heidi Corkern
published
3.09
Carrie Perino
published 3.5
3.07
Alexis Bybel
published 3.5
Kate Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Perino + Bridget Ivanov2348% games−0.3% vs expected
Nancy Daetz + Rochelle Rich1443% games−1.6% vs expected
Bridget Ivanov + Rochelle Rich2346% games−3.6% vs expected
Alexis Bybel + Sia McDonald3349% games−9.3% vs expected
Alexis Bybel + Rochelle Rich134 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Butcher + Laura Gallagher134 matchesnot enough data
Madeleine Johnson + Laura Gallagher224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly McQueen + Rochelle Rich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Wallunas
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Andrea Callaway
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Tracy Arnaudon
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Madeleine Johnson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Laura Gallagher
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Veronica Butcher
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Vicki Riherd
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Jodie Dowling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Catherine Griffin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Sia McDonald
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Heather Schulte
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Nancy Daetz
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Bridget Ivanov
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Andrea Challinor
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rochelle Rich
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Marilee Headen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Kelly McQueen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Heidi Corkern
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carrie Perino
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Alexis Bybel
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kate Walker
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.