Teams

A18 2.5W BR Timken

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-10vs A18 2.5W GR FosterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Timken / Kari Schauer vs Valerie Fletcher / Kathleen Fletcher4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDena Morrison / Allison Pedrozo vs Sally Berry / Bonnie Tongate6-1, 6-1
2025-07-02vs A18 2.5W NC PenceLost 12
L#1 DoublesKari Schauer / Lindsay Zimmerman vs Chassity Pence / Jamie Griffith6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDena Morrison vs Courtney Lytle1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJane Timken / Michelle Patterson vs Holly Miller / Ellie Opperman6-1, 6-3
2025-06-26vs A18 2.5W AS AdkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay Zimmerman / Michelle Patterson vs Kelly Smith / Mary Lewis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDena Morrison vs Kate Adkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Pedrozo / Gloria Sheffield vs Gretchen Birkes / Samantha Vazquez2-6, 3-6
2025-06-18vs A18 2.5W SH MattinglySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKari Schauer / Lindsay Zimmerman vs Emily Kohmann / Sydney Rowlands6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGloria Sheffield / Dena Morrison vs Lauren Ransdell / Jaklyn Bosworth2-6, 3-6
2025-06-04vs A18 2.5W GR FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay Zimmerman / Dena Morrison vs Valerie Fletcher / Vickie Flynn4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAllison Pedrozo vs Kathleen Fletcher4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGloria Sheffield / Michelle Patterson vs Erin Kestner / Annette Foster6-4, 6-4
2025-05-28vs A18 2.5W NC PenceWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Schauer / Michelle Patterson vs Courtney Lytle / Jamie Griffith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDena Morrison vs Ava Geinzer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllison Pedrozo / Elizabeth Milavickas vs Holly Miller / Keely Kent2-6, 5-7
2025-05-21vs A18 2.5W AS AdkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Timken / Elizabeth Milavickas vs Kelly Smith / Mary Lewis3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDena Morrison vs Gretchen Birkes7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Pedrozo / Gloria Sheffield vs Patricia Zupan / Deissy Houmard6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-14vs A18 2.5W SH MattinglyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKari Schauer / Lindsay Zimmerman vs Kelly Widders / Lauren Ransdell6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDena Morrison vs Stephanie Sherer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Goff / Michelle Patterson vs Alyssa Burgess / Kourtney King4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO/Chopra/A18/2.5W9127311173
2A18 2.5W PCC Innes8221920217
3A18 2.5W SP Goumas64181230257
4A18 2.5W CV1 Fromson55141635273
5A18 2.5W FA Rucker55141637287
6A18 2.5W BR Timken44131126210
7A18 2.5W LT1 McCauley46151532250
8A18 2.5W LT3 Morgan46121840280
9A18 2.5W LCC Brady26101431241
10A18 2.5W AO Yaman2661836249
11A18 2.5W SH Mattingly1781633233
12A18 2.5W CV2 Kleinman01032755338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Dena Morrison
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Evrim Fulmer
published
2.43
Lindsay Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Kari Schauer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Allison Pedrozo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.29
Elizabeth Milavickas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.07
Jane Timken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Gloria Sheffield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Becca Savage
published
Danielle Walton
published
Michele Goff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Weslee Marcelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dena Morrison + Elizabeth Milavickas4259% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Sheffield + Elizabeth Milavickas0526% gamesnot enough data
Dena Morrison + Kari Schauer5066% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Sheffield + Evrim Fulmer134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Timken + Kari Schauer044 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Zimmerman + Dena Morrison224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Timken + Lindsay Zimmerman303 matchesnot enough data
Jane Timken + Elizabeth Milavickas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Dena Morrison
53W–40L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Evrim Fulmer
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
Lindsay Zimmerman
23W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
Kari Schauer
25W–30L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Allison Pedrozo
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
Elizabeth Milavickas
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Jane Timken
16W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Gloria Sheffield
19W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Becca Savage
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Danielle Walton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Goff
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Weslee Marcelli
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.