Teams

Lee - 40 Luv

2024 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoberta Lake / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Joan Eliot / Anne Walker6-1, 6-4
2024-07-16vs Gibbons - Maple LeafsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Page Groseclose vs Janet Rathbone / Stephanie Kennedy6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Saunders / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Judi Shoemaker / Theresa Manion4-6, 2-6
2024-07-09vs Gibbons - Maple LeafsLost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Minicucci vs Kendra McQuillan4-6, 1-3
2024-07-02vs Providakes - Mood SwingsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRoberta Lake / Mary Saunders vs April Providakes / Tina Woods4-6, 2-6
2024-06-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Minicucci vs Susan Egan7-5, 4-3
2024-06-18vs Lynch - LGCC & FriendsWon 20
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Kristen Pettrone vs Lindsey Frye / Aldona Petraitis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Saunders / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Lucy Townsend / Hasina Hafner6-2, 6-3
2024-06-11vs Place - Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Teresa Condon / Carol Busey6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kristen Pettrone
published
3.33
Elizabeth Minicucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Roberta Lake
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Robbie Marchant
published
3.24
Mary Saunders
published
3.05
Page Groseclose
published
3.03
Dana Kelly
published 3.5
2.63
Shirley McInturff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Minicucci + Roberta Lake13854% games+9.3% vs expected
Mary Saunders + Elizabeth Minicucci6165% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Pettrone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Minicucci
65W–63L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Roberta Lake
66W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Robbie Marchant
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Mary Saunders
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Page Groseclose
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Dana Kelly
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Shirley McInturff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.