Teams

FWCD HALPERN

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies N · A

27 players · average NTRP 3.46 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Rachel Lackey
published
3.62
Amelia Owre
published 4
3.52
Blair Manning
published 3.5
3.46
Katherine Margeson
published
3.43
Brittni Fitzhugh
published 3.5
3.41
Kirsten Hancock
published
3.41
Kirsten Hancock
published
3.39
Briana Stierwalt
published 3.5
3.36
Kim Milam
published
3.36
Danielle Milner
published 3.5
3.29
Tiffany Mckelvey
published
Aly Halpern
published 3.5
Aly Halpern
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Brenner
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Brenner
published 3.5
3.23
Christen O'Neal
published 3.5
3.23
Christen O'Neal
published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Esco
published
3.14
Mary-Alex Thacker
published
3.14
Mary-Alex Thacker
published
3.05
Mandy Kirwan
published
2.97
JOSALYN SAMSON
published
2.97
JOSALYN SAMSON
published
2.90
Deborah Arnold
published 3
2.82
Kate Vinson
published
2.77
Ashley Berzon
published 3
Jennifer Richter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Stierwalt + Kim Milam5262% games+9.1% vs expected
Tiffany Mckelvey + Danielle Milner5167% gamesnot enough data
Mary-Alex Thacker + Katherine Margeson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Lackey
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Amelia Owre
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
3.5
Blair Manning
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Katherine Margeson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Brittni Fitzhugh
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kirsten Hancock
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kirsten Hancock
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Briana Stierwalt
22W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kim Milam
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Danielle Milner
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Tiffany Mckelvey
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Aly Halpern
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Aly Halpern
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amy Brenner
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Brenner
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Christen O'Neal
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Christen O'Neal
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Michelle Esco
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mary-Alex Thacker
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Mary-Alex Thacker
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Mandy Kirwan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
JOSALYN SAMSON
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
JOSALYN SAMSON
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Deborah Arnold
21W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kate Vinson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ashley Berzon
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jennifer Richter
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.