Teams

GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Andalis/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.82
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3
Alberto Batalla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.66
Anita Boss
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.66
Craig Fortune
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jose Andalis
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Juan Taveras
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Monica Bordagaray
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Patricia Samonte
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Rich Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sam Guido
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Syed Yusoof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Schlotterbeck + Celia Al-Tahan10558% games+12.0% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273547% games+5.4% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Anita Boss121248% games+2.8% vs expected
Celia Al-Tahan + Anita Boss252249% games−2.8% vs expected
Patricia Samonte + Lourdes Olivas4746% gamesnot enough data
Lourdes Olivas + Monica Bordagaray3839% gamesnot enough data
Dina Schlotterbeck + Monica Bordagaray3641% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Samonte + Celia Al-Tahan3547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 39 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Celia Al-Tahan
119W–164L career · 57 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Alberto Batalla
51W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dina Schlotterbeck
62W–81L career · 29 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Anita Boss
85W–102L career · 34 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Craig Fortune
25W–62L career · 20 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jose Andalis
37W–51L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Taveras
6W–42L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
74W–65L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
98W–118L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Bordagaray
40W–96L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Samonte
28W–67L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rich Mayo
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Guido
9W–15L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–97L career · 45 lines in 2025
not enough data
Syed Yusoof
9W–45L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.