Teams

DRC - Die Tri-ing

2026 Tri-Level Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5

18 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-01-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Casey / Robert Barton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-12-14vs Break Point TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Foret / Jeff Conston vs Spike Vrusho / Alex Madeira6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnthony Frangione / Todd Redl vs Brian Walker / Gabriel Panadero6-2, 6-2
2025-11-23vs SportsplexWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Diaz / John McKee vs Michael Justiana / Enver Candan6-0, 6-0
2025-11-09vs Break Point TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Casey / Raul Velasquez vs Joseph Lamerson / Ron Kimberling0-6, 2-6
2025-11-02vs Break Point TennisLost 02
L#2 DoublesTodd Redl / Anthony Frangione vs Daniel Hunt / Brian Walker4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRobert Barton / Raul Velasquez vs Gabriel Panadero / Ron Kimberling3-6, 2-6
2025-10-19vs SportsplexWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Diaz / John McKee vs Michael Justiana / Emile Blanc6-4, 6-3
2025-10-03vs SportsplexWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnthony Frangione / Todd Redl vs Scott Earl / Daniel Silverhardt6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Diaz / James Casey vs Enver Candan / Faber Carmona6-4, 6-2
2025-09-28vs Break Point TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesValen Zeltser / Jeff Conston vs GERALD PROTHEROE / David Bresnahan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Cassidy / Todd Redl vs Brian Walker / Bing Yang6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Diaz / James Casey vs Dennis Giauque / Joseph Lamerson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
John McKee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Timothy Polanish
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
John Sirman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Jeff Conston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Eric Foret
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Marc Alston
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Valen Zeltser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
James Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Thomas Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Diana Regini
published 3
2.90
Erwin Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Prabhas Viswanathan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Todd Redl
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.86
Anthony Frangione
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Raul Velasquez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
David Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Gil Lobell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Barton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Sirman + Eric Foret8165% games+14.9% vs expected
Marc Alston + Jeff Conston7356% games+5.9% vs expected
Todd Redl + Gil Lobell11635% games−5.6% vs expected
Marc Alston + Eric Foret5156% gamesnot enough data
Erwin Watson + James Casey2355% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Frangione + Eric Foret134 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Frangione + Todd Redl224 matchesnot enough data
James Casey + Raul Velasquez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John McKee
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Timothy Polanish
28W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
John Sirman
69W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Jeff Conston
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Eric Foret
46W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Marc Alston
58W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Valen Zeltser
33W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
James Casey
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Thomas Cassidy
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Diana Regini
152W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Erwin Watson
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Prabhas Viswanathan
51W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Todd Redl
38W–48L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Anthony Frangione
44W–75L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Raul Velasquez
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.74
2.5
David Diaz
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.65
Gil Lobell
7W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Robert Barton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.