Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW4.0B

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Kim
published 4
3.96
Zuhal Elhan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.94
Karlene Steelman
published
3.88
Stacey Blackman
published
3.69
Jennifer Grant
published
3.66
Heather Houston
published
3.64
Joanna Sienkiewicz
published
3.63
Julie Yi
published
3.62
Susan Aneja
published
3.58
Tami Lightle
published
3.54
Michelle Estrada
published
3.54
Shannon Lynch
published
3.53
Kathleen Olla
published
3.33
Sarah Russell
published
3.30
Hui Xie
published
Mi Qi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Yi + Susan Aneja6263% games+11.4% vs expected
Sarah Russell + Karlene Steelman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Kim
31W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
Zuhal Elhan
75W–39L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Karlene Steelman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.94
Stacey Blackman
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jennifer Grant
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Joanna Sienkiewicz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Julie Yi
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Susan Aneja
37W–31L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Tami Lightle
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michelle Estrada
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Shannon Lynch
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathleen Olla
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sarah Russell
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.33
Hui Xie
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Mi Qi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.