Teams

White - Genesis Rock Road

2022 KS 55 & Over Adult League · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-04vs Bagwell - Genesis, Rock RoadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Ball / Cathy Suellentrop vs Kathleen Bagwell / Barbara Frey6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLily Fang-Yen / Linda Anderson vs Peggy Powell / Barbara Nelson2-6, 4-3, 0-1
2022-02-25vs Bagwell - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Hull / Libby Marshall vs Kate Bastian / Ginger Brown6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Munds / DeAnn White vs Kathleen Bagwell / Barbara Frey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Criser / Mitzi Hackney vs Barbara Nelson / Peggy Powell6-3, 6-4
2022-02-20vs KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarsha Mawhirter / Brenda Munds vs Carol Cramer / Hildegard McManus6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Ball / Linda Criser vs Debbie Flynn / Karen Speaks3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Le / Cathy Suellentrop vs Cathy Rinehart / Candace Herman7-5, 3-5, 0-1
2022-02-20vs KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMitzi Hackney / Linda Criser vs Carol Cramer / Carol Tenpenny6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Suellentrop / Brenda Munds vs Debbie Flynn / Candace Herman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Ball / Marsha Mawhirter vs Gayle West / Karen Speaks2-6, 3-6
2022-02-11vs Bagwell - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarsha Mawhirter / DeAnn White vs Peggy Powell / Dotsie Cuillo6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelanie Joseph / Lily Fang-Yen vs Penny Wright / Ginger Brown6-0, 6-0
2022-01-29vs KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Hull / Libby Marshall vs Candace Herman / Debbie Flynn2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Suellentrop / DeAnn White vs Cathy Rinehart / Margo Stewart6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Anderson / Lily Fang-Yen vs Karen Speaks / Debra Schwarz1-6, 2-6
2022-01-29vs KS/Rinehart/55&Over7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Joseph / Lily Fang-Yen vs Margo Stewart / Debbie Flynn7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarsha Mawhirter / Brenda Munds vs Cathy Rinehart / Candace Herman6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Ball / Mitzi Hackney vs Karen Speaks / Debra Schwarz4-6, 2-6
2022-01-21vs Bagwell - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Joseph / Libby Marshall vs Kathleen Bagwell / Barbara Frey7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarsha Mawhirter / Brenda Munds vs Ginger Brown / Rose Pelton6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Ball / Julie Le vs Barbara Nelson / Peggy Powell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cathy Suellentrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Melanie Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.29
Cindy Hull
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Brenda Munds
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Diane Ball
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Mitzi Hackney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
DeAnn White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
1.92
Kathleen Fader
published
Libby Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Lily Fang-Yen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Criser
published
Marsha Mawhirter
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Hull + Linda Anderson7555% games+4.0% vs expected
Brenda Munds + Cathy Suellentrop5354% games+0.6% vs expected
Marsha Mawhirter + DeAnn White8356% games−0.9% vs expected
Linda Anderson + DeAnn White9262% games−2.0% vs expected
Cindy Hull + DeAnn White6950% games−2.5% vs expected
Marsha Mawhirter + Brenda Munds18858% games−3.4% vs expected
Cindy Hull + Brenda Munds3449% games−5.1% vs expected
DeAnn White + Cathy Suellentrop4451% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Suellentrop
57W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Joseph
52W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cindy Hull
63W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Brenda Munds
115W–91L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diane Ball
78W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Mitzi Hackney
20W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
DeAnn White
63W–107L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Kathleen Fader
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Libby Marshall
40W–29L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lily Fang-Yen
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Anderson
52W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Criser
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marsha Mawhirter
93W–44L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.