Teams

Forbes - soloists

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-09-29vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Marthens vs Yiziying Chen1-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs Bucci - No PressureSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Sueyun Hsieh2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-13vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Marthens vs Jessica Bynum2-6, 0-6
2025-09-07vs My HOmiesLost 03
L#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Lucy Wang6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Alina Limpert2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Jessica Bynum5-7, 3-6
2025-09-06vs Bucci - No PressureWon 20
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Sueyun Hsieh2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMari Collins vs Joanna Pappafotis6-3, 6-4
2025-08-19Won 20
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Joanna Pappafotis6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMari Collins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-11vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Yiziying Chen2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Alexis McCary2-6, 0-6
2025-07-31vs Bucci - No PressureWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Marthens vs Diane Fletcher6-4, 6-2
2025-07-17vs Bucci - No PressureWon 20
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Irena Bucci6-4, 5-1
W#3 SinglesMari Collins vs Kris Morris6-3, 6-2
2025-07-10vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Yiziying Chen3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Lucy Wang4-6, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sara Orthwein
published
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.85
Mari Collins
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Marthens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.59
Maria Vassileva
published
Ellen Lee
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Halley + Mari Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Orthwein
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Mari Collins
76W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Chanpen Teeranon
209W–208L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lisa Marthens
56W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Ellen Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.