Teams

BHSC - Good Gets

2022 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Wendi Ruschmann vs Megan Greenwood / Bethany Johnson6-3, 6-1
2022-06-05vs FarmingtonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Laura Pietro vs Olivia Wages / Shannon Mrazik7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Loring Woodriff6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Wendi Ruschmann vs Kimberlee Barrett-Johnson / Pender Graves6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs ACACWon 10
W#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Wendi Ruschmann vs Elizabeth Glover / Saundra Barrett6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-15vs FarmingtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Pietro / Wendi Ruschmann vs Ann Hay Hardy / Loring Woodriff6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Sherry Lake vs Patti Pate / Courtney Sievers6-1, 6-2
2022-05-07vs BHS - IIWon 20
W#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Gretchen Masselli vs Kathryn Harris / Anne Curran Small6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Melanie Levine6-1, 6-0
2022-05-01vs ACACWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Candice van der Linde6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs FarmingtonWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Pender Graves6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Wendi Ruschmann vs Ann Hay Hardy / Jennifer Keevil7-5, 6-1
2022-04-10vs ACACWon 10
W#1 DoublesGretchen Masselli / Wendi Ruschmann vs Saundra Barrett / Mary Ensminger6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Lindy Kastendike
published 3
2.92
Natasha Heller
published
2.90
2.81
Jannemieke Keener
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Wendi Ruschmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.24
Sherry Lake
published
Laura Pietro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jannemieke Keener + Wendi Ruschmann9954% games+8.2% vs expected
Lindy Kastendike + Wendi Ruschmann224 matchesnot enough data
Anita McGinty + Lindy Kastendike303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 10 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Lindy Kastendike
73W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Natasha Heller
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Wendi Ruschmann
69W–67L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Sherry Lake
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.