Teams

Fahrmeier-The WooHoo's!-KCC

*2025 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesNina Brown / Stacey Emmons vs Stephanie Burton / Becky Fralix6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTara Kelley / Nina Brown vs Arwen Beerman / Lauren Laborde6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs Wells-Go Get Them-Woodlands ParksWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Fahrmeier / Nina Brown vs Carol Davis / Maria Pons6-2, 6-0
2025-07-01vs Curry-Break Point-WoodlandsLost 01
L#2 DoublesNina Brown / Courtney Lees vs PAIGE PHUONG / Christine Nguyen5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMichelle Purdy / Tammy Wambaugh vs Catherine Cotter / Krista Thompson6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDonna Ullrich vs Marsha Madhu6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTara Kelley / Darcie Schlegel vs Silvina Barrella / Yolanda Levingston1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJill Stofa vs Melissa Fitzgerald1-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs Wells-Go Get Them-Woodlands ParksWon 10
W#2 DoublesTara Kelley / Nina Brown vs Kim-Hien Wells / Annie Lindholmer7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBeth Carlson / Leslie Talley vs Yolanda Levingston / Amy Hughes4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesDonna Ullrich vs Rachel Sharp6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Wambaugh / Lori Robertson vs Laura Baxter / Stephanie Hull6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMi Ae Roll vs Melissa Fitzgerald2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesThuy Tran / Stacey Emmons vs Mary Guide / Catherine Cotter0-6, 4-6
2025-05-07vs Curry-Break Point-WoodlandsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Purdy / Nina Brown vs Suya Rossouw / Zi Giotta5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Michelle Purdy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Tammy Wambaugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Beth Carlson
published 4
Courtney Lees
published 4
Nina Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.55
Donna Ullrich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Risa Cogliandro
published
3.48
Leslie Talley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Mi Ae Roll
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Jill Stofa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Darcie Schlegel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Brooke Parry
published 3.5
3.26
Stacey Emmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Thuy Tran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenna Liming
published
Karen Fahrmeier
published
Tara Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Kelley + Courtney Lees3361% games+14.0% vs expected
Tammy Wambaugh + Donna Ullrich2452% games−3.8% vs expected
Darcie Schlegel + Tara Kelley224 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Schlegel + Jill Stofa134 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Schlegel + Thuy Tran123 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Schlegel + Nina Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Darcie Schlegel + Brooke Parry303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Emmons + Thuy Tran123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Purdy
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Tammy Wambaugh
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Beth Carlson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Courtney Lees
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Nina Brown
79W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Ullrich
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Risa Cogliandro
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Leslie Talley
32W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Mi Ae Roll
20W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Jill Stofa
25W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Darcie Schlegel
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brooke Parry
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Stacey Emmons
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
Thuy Tran
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jenna Liming
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Fahrmeier
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Kelley
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.