Teams

Lima

2026 Adult 18 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-08vs NAZ/Mraz/18&over/4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Weber / Mark Navarro vs Andy Mraz / Kirk Westervelt3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBradley Warren vs AJ Mraz6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Baranowski / Steve Boadway vs Kevin Felix / George Molina6-7, 2-6
2026-03-08vs NAZ/Mraz/18&over/4.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesBradley Warren / Timothy Weber vs Andy Mraz / Matthew Mraz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Baranowski / Steve Boadway vs AJ Mraz / Kevin Felix4-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs NAZ/Mraz/18&over/4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Navarro / Timothy Weber vs Sterling Fetty / Kirk Westervelt5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Baranowski vs Andy Mraz6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathaniel Lima / Bradley Warren vs Zachary Hackerott / George Molina1-6, 1-6
2026-02-27vs KumasakaLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Weber / Jeffrey Baranowski vs John Malone / August Fahy0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathaniel Lima / Bradley Warren vs Blake Cain / Steven Riggs6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Boadway / Talai Osmonbekov vs Jim Haslett / David Kumasaka6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs AVILost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Baranowski / Nathaniel Lima vs Chris Howard / John Curtis2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBradley Warren vs Pono Makuakane2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTimothy Weber / Mark Navarro vs Jeffery Henderson / Kevin Woog3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-07vs KumasakaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTimothy Weber / Mark Navarro vs Robert Voytek / Bryan Gest6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Baranowski vs David Maples2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBradley Warren / Nathaniel Lima vs Steven Riggs / Blake Cain6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Chan / Talai Osmonbekov vs Jim Haslett / Nicholas Voichick2-6, 4-6
2026-02-01vs AVIWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Boadway / Mark Navarro vs Jeffery Henderson / Luke Thesing5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Baranowski / John Lee vs Brian Buchholtz / Dan Salcito6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBradley Warren / Nathaniel Lima vs Pono Makuakane / Frank Coe6-3, 6-4
2026-01-31vs AVILost 04
L#1 DoublesVinh Ly / Jeffrey Baranowski vs John Curtis / Chris Howard2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNathaniel Lima vs Pono Makuakane1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Warren / John Lee vs Billy Bilbray / Jacob Zierenberg4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Navarro / Steve Boadway vs Clem Brasket / Daniel Beffel3-6, 6-7
2026-01-18vs KumasakaLost 04
L#1 DoublesSteve Boadway / Talai Osmonbekov vs Bryan Gest / Keiji Iwai6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMark Navarro vs John Malone3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathaniel Lima / Michael Chan vs Robert Voytek / Blake Cain2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Warren / John Lee vs David Kumasaka / Jim Haslett1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NAZ 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Timothy Weber
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Feng Yang
published 4
3.68
Bradley Warren
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.63
Diego Constante
published 4
3.58
Mark Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.49
Craig Abney
published 4
3.48
Nathaniel Lima
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.40
Talai Osmonbekov
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Steve Boadway
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jeffrey Baranowski
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.12
John Kolody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diego Constante + Craig Abney6257% games+0.6% vs expected
Steve Boadway + Jeffrey Baranowski0528% games+0.3% vs expected
Mark Navarro + Timothy Weber3349% games−0.2% vs expected
John Kolody + Craig Abney101047% games−3.8% vs expected
John Kolody + Diego Constante134 matchesnot enough data
Nathaniel Lima + Bradley Warren224 matchesnot enough data
John Kolody + Mark Navarro033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Navarro + Craig Abney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Weber
33W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Feng Yang
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Bradley Warren
2W–7L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Diego Constante
84W–52L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Mark Navarro
32W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Craig Abney
210W–299L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Nathaniel Lima
3W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Talai Osmonbekov
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Steve Boadway
0W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.18
Jeffrey Baranowski
1W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.17
John Kolody
62W–102L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.