Teams

6 CCV DeLacey

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-12vs 5 KRA TurnerWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaren Williamson vs Melanie Spears6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMegan Hodges vs Lauren Turner6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAnne Henry vs Katherine Czyszczon6-4, 6-4
2025-11-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Jennifer Smith5-7, 2-6
2025-11-06vs 2 ACAC MorganLost 01
L#3 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Kristen Walton2-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs 1 Willow Oaks CurdtsLost 01
L#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Gena Burr2-6, 4-6
2025-10-01vs 3 Raintree VerderyWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Caroline Verdery6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
3.94
Megan Hodges
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
3.73
Karen Williamson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Anne Henry
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.48
Mary Beth Scott
published
3.40
Laura West Hatcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Benevento + Megan Hodges404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Benevento
14W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.00
Megan Hodges
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Alexandra Huffman
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4.5
Anne Henry
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
Mary Beth Scott
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Laura West Hatcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.