Teams

Songy-Guidotti/55/3.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Toups / Jerry Lamkin vs Bill Bass / Timothy Hoy5-7, 5-7
2025-02-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKenny Boudreaux / Jerry Lamkin vs Stephen Short / Henry Ferger4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe Sheffield / Jerry Lamkin vs Stephen Short / Henry Ferger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek5113514138
2Songy-Guidotti/55/3.5/M/Pelican3381021159
3Morise/55/3.5/M/Franco's1561226188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Chris D Coincon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Ellis Iverson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jerry Lamkin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joe Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
John Fournet
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Kenny Boudreaux
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Paul Folkins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Paul Guidotti
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Ronnie Cazabon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sid Hauptmann
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Steven Toups
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Wayne Durr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Wayne Songy
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronnie Cazabon + Kenny Boudreaux033 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Durr + Sid Hauptmann123 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Durr + Chris D Coincon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris D Coincon
12W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ellis Iverson
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Jerry Lamkin
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Sheffield
4W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Fournet
4W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenny Boudreaux
2W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Folkins
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Guidotti
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Cazabon
4W–25L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sid Hauptmann
8W–11L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Toups
2W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Durr
9W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Songy
12W–22L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.