Teams

55+ and Still Smashing

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 8.0 55+

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 8.0 55+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Staley Gray
published
Angie Shoemaker
published 4
Cecilia Griffis
published 4
3.66
Grainne Gilliam
published 4
3.65
Debbie Zeitz
published 4
3.63
Mindy Baldwin
published
3.59
Kelly Ollendorff
published
3.45
Tess Castleberry
published
3.13
Michelle Pearcy
published
Kari Roberts
published
Linda Pfitzner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grainne Gilliam + Kari Roberts3353% gamesnot enough data
Linda Pfitzner + Kelly Ollendorff134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Pfitzner + Grainne Gilliam213 matchesnot enough data
Grainne Gilliam + Tess Castleberry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Staley Gray
22W–39L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.83
4
Angie Shoemaker
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cecilia Griffis
39W–32L career · type T · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Grainne Gilliam
62W–51L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Debbie Zeitz
59W–36L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mindy Baldwin
32W–18L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kelly Ollendorff
78W–79L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Tess Castleberry
46W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Michelle Pearcy
29W–31L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kari Roberts
25W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Pfitzner
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.