Teams

CC-LLW- SLOCC Hanna Smith Adult 18 3.0W

2024 USTA 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.0 W 18 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.0 W 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Hanna Smith
published
3.73
Abrianna Rose
published 3.5
3.63
Danielle Corry
published 3.5
3.44
Camila Strong
published 3.5
3.08
Tessa Kotch
published
3.01
Sydney Ereno
published
2.85
Alicia Iqbal
published 3
Carlee Starkey
published 3
2.67
Natasha Mercurio
published
2.63
Megan Haupt
published
2.55
Arianna Fasse
published 3
Kaaren Abbate
published
Megan Humpal
published
Sariah Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camila Strong + Hanna Smith13262% games+2.3% vs expected
Tessa Kotch + Sydney Ereno2346% gamesnot enough data
Tessa Kotch + Sariah Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
Abrianna Rose + Danielle Corry303 matchesnot enough data
Arianna Fasse + Megan Haupt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hanna Smith
32W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
3.5
Abrianna Rose
48W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Danielle Corry
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Camila Strong
42W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tessa Kotch
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.08
Sydney Ereno
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Alicia Iqbal
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Carlee Starkey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Natasha Mercurio
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Megan Haupt
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Arianna Fasse
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kaaren Abbate
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Humpal
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sariah Gutierrez
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.