Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.5M Spin Doctors

2026 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18&O 3.5M

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesArthur de Oliveira Lima / Geoffrey Lin vs Robbie Bauer / Nicholas LeVanti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-08vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesHans Dee / Arthur de Oliveira Lima vs Joe Settelmyer / Eungkon Kim2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDoyeon Kim vs Yongkyu An2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesFrancesco Botticella / Geoffrey Lin vs Yongbin Kim / Yoochan Shin6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesLijian Zhang / Arthur de Oliveira Lima vs Doug Green / Wayne Smith6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDoyeon Kim vs Eric Kuo2-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M B4BWon 20
W#1 DoublesLijian Zhang / Hans Dee vs Nitin Bhosale / Robbie Bauer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrett Henneberg / Geoffrey Lin vs Nicholas LeVanti / Oris Watkins7-5, 7-5
2026-06-03vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M KTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesArthur de Oliveira Lima / Patrick Hammie vs Sung Min Moon / Eungkon Kim2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHans Dee / Francesco Botticella vs Yoochan Shin / Yongbin Kim6-4, 7-5
2026-05-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Hammie / Geoffrey Lin vs Juan Lopez / Jay Rafi7-5, 6-3
2026-05-20vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M B4BWon 30
W#1 DoublesArthur de Oliveira Lima / Mark Killick vs Michael Bantz / David Molitor6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHans Dee / Charles Sikora vs Nitin Bhosale / Joseph Reiter6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDoyeon Kim / Robert Vanhootegem vs Timothy Ellis / Nicholas LeVanti7-5, 6-0
2026-05-13vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M KTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Hammie / Geoffrey Lin vs Zeno Jo / Yongkyu An6-2, 6-4
2026-05-06vs MSIL A18&O 3.5M Smokin' AcesWon 21
L#1 SinglesBen Lee vs Eric Kuo3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKai Wang / Mark Killick vs Eduard Kirr / Matteo Martinelli6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGeoffrey Lin / Hans Dee vs Andy Wilke / Jay Rafi6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · East MSIL A18&O 3.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL A18&O 3.5M Spin Doctors72281739373
2MSIL A18&O 3.5M B4B54202554403
3MSIL A18&O 3.5M KTC36232251410
4MSIL A18&O 3.5M Smokin' Aces36192658438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Robert Vanhootegem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Charles Sikora
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Ben Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Brett Henneberg
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Lijian Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.33
Patrick Hammie
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.28
Arthur de Oliveira Lima
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Vinod Ramakrishnan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.19
Geoffrey Lin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Doyeon Kim
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Mark Killick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Francesco Botticella
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
2.95
Hans Dee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kai Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francesco Botticella + Geoffrey Lin6449% games−2.8% vs expected
Patrick Hammie + Charles Sikora0830% games−18.5% vs expected
Lijian Zhang + Charles Sikora1631% gamesnot enough data
Francesco Botticella + Lijian Zhang3265% gamesnot enough data
Kai Wang + Lijian Zhang2337% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Hammie + Geoffrey Lin404 matchesnot enough data
Ben Lee + Lijian Zhang404 matchesnot enough data
Doyeon Kim + Kai Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robert Vanhootegem
95W–110L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
3.5
Charles Sikora
41W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ben Lee
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Brett Henneberg
61W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Lijian Zhang
112W–59L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Patrick Hammie
37W–38L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Arthur de Oliveira Lima
14W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Vinod Ramakrishnan
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Geoffrey Lin
14W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Doyeon Kim
19W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Mark Killick
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Francesco Botticella
41W–55L career · 9 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Hans Dee
28W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
Kai Wang
35W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.