Teams

Richardson - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Stephen McCrory vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-05vs Marino - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesCosme Barrios / Lauren Anderson vs Calvin Moore / Dawn Marino6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Richardson / Lisa Bew vs Shane Russell / Carly Russell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-23vs Stewart - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Bew / James Richardson vs Renee Bradford / Emilio Bustillo3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-22vs Brown - PCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesCosme Barrios / Lauren Anderson vs David Bushing / Grace Allen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCollin Perciballi / Marina Agadzi vs Reed Taylor / Caroline Struck6-3, 6-2
2024-07-08vs Escambia/Andresen/18&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen McCrory / Marina Agadzi vs Shannon Schluter / Ali Kizilbash4-6, 5-7
2024-06-24vs Miller - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesCosme Barrios / Lauren Anderson vs Christopher Brown / Erin Rhone2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen McCrory / Marina Agadzi vs Robert Fabbro / Jennifer Passeretti2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
4.13
Cosme Barrios
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.97
Sam Richardson
published
3.89
Lisa Bew
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
published
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
James Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cosme Barrios + Lisa Bew224 matchesnot enough data
Sam Richardson + Michael Richardson Jr033 matchesnot enough data
Sam Richardson + Collin Perciballi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Richardson Jr
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cosme Barrios
59W–62L career · 10 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
Sam Richardson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Lisa Bew
77W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Collin Perciballi
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
James Richardson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.