Teams

Blossom Pichot 55+

2022 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cheryl Adams
published 4
3.71
Brook Harris
published 4
3.65
Margaret Neiheisel
published
3.60
Leigh Freeman
published
3.36
Kay Hendrix
published
3.30
Katherine Larsen
published
Emma Mathis
published 3.5
3.20
Lindsay Barton
published
3.17
Talat Shah
published
3.13
Carol Pichot
published 3.5
Jane Pelley
published
JoEvelyn Etter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Hendrix + Lindsay Barton5649% games−0.1% vs expected
Katherine Larsen + Kay Hendrix4551% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Adams
33W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brook Harris
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Margaret Neiheisel
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Leigh Freeman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.60
Kay Hendrix
30W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Katherine Larsen
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Emma Mathis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Barton
26W–33L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Talat Shah
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Carol Pichot
0W–26L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Jane Pelley
1W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
JoEvelyn Etter
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.