← Teams

THPRD-Blebea/Lee

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
NANDA SIDDAIAH
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Agus Rusli
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.55
Joel Fenner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Edmund Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Angie Urrutia
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Kaoru Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Hien Lu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Zhong Lei
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Catherine Huang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Diana Blebea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–30L career
0%98%2%
3.83
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.82
3.5
Joel Fenner
26W–18L career · type S
0%70%30%
3.55
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Angie Urrutia
72W–39L career
0%98%2%
3.34
3.5
Trina Newcomb
78W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Kaoru Nelson
41W–37L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Hien Lu
51W–60L career
12%88%0%
3.12
3.5
Zhong Lei
65W–39L career
32%68%0%
3.01
3
Catherine Huang
94W–61L career
0%93%7%
2.93
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
2%98%0%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.