← Teams

N OR-CAC-McGarity

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Brandt Wegner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
—
Bruce Sylva
published 4.5
—
Chris Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.21
Frank Collie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
David Vant Hof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.01
Arthur Kowitch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.92
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
published 4.5
3.84
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.79
Rudd McGarity
published 4.5
Results9 ties
2025-06-21Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesChris Merrill / Rudd McGarity vs Todd Siegel / Christopher Haddon6-2, 6-2
2025-06-20Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRudd McGarity / Chris Merrill vs Steve Buckingham / Al Stonas7-6, 6-4
2024-11-23Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / David Vant Hof vs Jack Griffin / Leonard Wofford6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrank Collie / Rudd McGarity vs Keith Abel / Glenn Woodworth1-0
2024-11-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesArthur Kowitch / Richard Shugar vs Rodrigo Aguilar / Mike Easton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Merrill / Rudd McGarity vs Robert Torch / Christopher Haddon6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Toby Krauel vs David Wiley / Todd Siegel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Brandt Wegner vs Mitchell Strauss / Mark Vukanovich6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Merrill / Arthur Kowitch vs Paul Wulf / Steve Bolstad7-6, 6-1
2024-10-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesFrank Collie / Francisco Rivera-Giusti vs Todd Mansfield / Christopher Haddon6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Brandt Wegner vs Chresten Gram / Bo Johnson6-3, 7-6
2024-10-05Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Christopher Haddon / Mike Easton6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Merrill / Arthur Kowitch vs Bryan Ward / David Squire6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Brandt Wegner vs Mitchell Strauss / Mark Vukanovich1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArthur Kowitch / David Vant Hof vs Mike McNairy / Glenn Woodworth6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Ezelle / Chris Merrill vs Jack Griffin / Steve Eggerts6-1, 6-3
2024-09-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPaul Ezelle / Chris Merrill vs Daniel Larsen / David Squire6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFrank Collie / Brandt Wegner vs Craig Johanson / Todd Siegel7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Vant Hof / Arthur Kowitch vs Robert Torch / Christopher Haddon6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Brandt Wegner
99W–70L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Bruce Sylva
16W–15L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Chris Merrill
20W–13L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Frank Collie
144W–54L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4.5
David Vant Hof
89W–41L career
9%91%0%
4.05
4.5
Arthur Kowitch
66W–33L career
22%78%0%
4.01
4.5
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
62W–56L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
126W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.84
4.5
Rudd McGarity
33W–65L career
73%27%0%
3.79

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.