Teams

Lesko (S)

2026 STL Adult 18 & Over Spring · Men 5.0

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-02vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Carney / Michael Lesko vs Mcafee Burke / Oscar Pachon2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMYLES KRZEWINSKI vs Christopher Clayton1-6, 3-6
2026-05-26vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Lesko / Franklin Zhong vs Austin Diehl / Steve Moehn3-3
L#1 SinglesMYLES KRZEWINSKI vs Mcafee Burke2-6
2026-05-19vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan White / Franklin Zhong vs Rob White / Austin Diehl6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRay Ohara vs Christopher Clayton6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Carney / Michael Lesko vs Tyler Raclin / Oscar Pachon2-6, 2-6
2026-05-12vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLukas Gosselin / Franklin Zhong vs Tyler Raclin / Sergiu Celebidachi0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Lesko vs Austin Diehl0-6, 1-6
2026-04-21vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLukas Gosselin / MYLES KRZEWINSKI vs Austin Diehl / Tyler Raclin6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Lesko / Ray Ohara vs Steve Moehn / Rob White4-6, 6-7
2026-04-14vs STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRay Ohara / MYLES KRZEWINSKI vs Rob White / Mcafee Burke1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Lesko vs Sergiu Celebidachi1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLukas Gosselin / Michael Carney vs Oscar Pachon / Steve Moehn2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0M60180271
2Lesko (S)0601835211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Lukas Gosselin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.53
Michael Lesko
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.50
Franklin Zhong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
MYLES KRZEWINSKI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.46
Ray Ohara
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
4.29
Ryan White
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #1 Singles 10% · published
Michael Carney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Lesko + Ryan White21163% games+9.9% vs expected
Michael Lesko + Franklin Zhong4161% gamesnot enough data
Ray Ohara + Ryan White404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lukas Gosselin
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.58
Michael Lesko
73W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.53
5
Franklin Zhong
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.50
MYLES KRZEWINSKI
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
4.48
Ray Ohara
87W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.46
Ryan White
131W–38L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
Michael Carney
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.