Teams

Di.Sugarman40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs La.Holderness40AWon 10
W#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Laurie Holderness7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Je.Komes40A3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / ROBIN STEWART vs Stacey Stephens / Sharon Fadelici0-6, 1-6
2025-04-15vs Mo.Garrell40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesCathy Marion / Laura Wingo vs Leanne Stradling / Teresa Defrancesco6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Kr.Gilreath40ALost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Taqiyya Yasin2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Wingo / Dana Cail vs Kristen Gillispie / Lisa Marshall6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Am.Ray40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Laura Wingo vs Louise Hutchinson / Louella Venable3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Lo.Henry40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Aimee Mikula vs Lorah Henry / Brooke Jenkins1-6, 3-6
2025-03-11vs Br.Robinson40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Wingo / Meredith Littke vs Erika Plant / Carolyn Elliott2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Crystal Beard6-7, 0-6
2025-03-10vs Ki.Lamb40AWon 10
W#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Lisa Merritt6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Erin Krupa
published
2.82
Dana Cail
published 3
2.80
Stephanie Black
published
Cathy Marion
published 3
2.59
Shannon Parham
published
2.59
ROBIN STEWART
published
2.55
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.55
Erin Maher
published
2.51
Meredith Littke
published
2.10
Laura Wingo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Steinhardt + Laura Wingo1633% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Krupa
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Dana Cail
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Stephanie Black
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cathy Marion
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
ROBIN STEWART
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Mandy Steinhardt
52W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Erin Maher
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Meredith Littke
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Laura Wingo
29W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.