Teams

DBaker-TOCH

2026 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-23vs CPeterson-HVCCWon 20
W#2 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Cecily Peterson7-5, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKim Hutter vs Deborah Hertzog6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-16vs KCabelka-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Jan ORegan6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Tracy Shelton6-3, 6-2
2026-06-09vs YDeaver-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Lula Melton5-7, 1-6
2026-06-02vs PDavis-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim Hutter vs Camille Blommer6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs YDeaver-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesKim Hutter vs Angela Davis6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Bay Scott6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Kellie Johnson6-1, 6-2
2026-05-19vs MLong-DURSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Stacy Brehm6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Richelle Robinson2-6, 4-6
2026-05-12vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Kinsey Wennerstrom4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKim Hutter vs Cecily Peterson2-6, 2-6
2026-05-05vs KCabelka-HRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKim Hutter vs Connie Brown5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Kim Cabelka7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YDeaver-DUR7118614147
2KCabelka-HR53141022173
3DBaker-TOCH53141023194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Meta Kuehn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Kim Hutter
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Janet Ranheim
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Liz Schaller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meta Kuehn
64W–113L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Kim Hutter
31W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–113L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.